LITTLETON, CO ·
OSHA Inspection: DDI DENVER CORP.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of DDI DENVER CORP. in 10570 BRADFORD RD., LITTLETON, CO 80127 (NAICS 334412). OSHA activity number 336656186.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DDI DENVER CORP.
- Site address
- 10570 BRADFORD RD.
- City
- LITTLETON
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 80127
- Mailing
- 10570 BRADFORD RD., LITTLETON, CO 80127
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 334412
- Employees
- 103
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Jan 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,890 · Current $2,890
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Installation and use. Listed or labeled equipment shall be installed and used in accordance with any instructions included in the listing or labeling. a) On or about August 29, 2012, and at times prior, employees were exposed to electrical shock because a power strip used in the plating area was connected to other extension cords or portable power outlets instead of directly to a permanently installed branch circuit receptacle.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $2890
- · Z (S) $2890
1910.303 C03 I
- Issued
- Jan 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(c)(3)(i): All splices and joints and the free ends of conductors were not covered with an insulation equivalent to that of the conductors or with an insulating device identified for the purpose. a) On or about August 29, 2012, and at times prior, employees were exposed to electrical shock because wire splices for a solenoid in the tin plating area which were joined by wire nuts were not insulated nor contained in an enclosure or junction box to protect them from contact.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.305 G01 IV
- Issued
- Jan 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv): Flexibles cords and cables were used for purposes prohibited by subparagraphs (a) through (e) of this paragraph: a) On or about August 29, 2012, and at times prior, employees were exposed to electrical shock and fire hazards because flexible cords were used as a substitute for fixed wiring (conduit) along the walls in the preclean and plating areas. In particular, flexible wiring was hardwired into a light switch which controlled a fan along the wall by the preclean tanks. b) On or about August 29, 2012, and at times prior, employees were exposed to electrical shock and fire hazards because flexible cords were attached to the building structure and surfaces such as pipe in the tin/lead plating area.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Jan 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that tension would not be transmitted to joints or terminal screws: a) On or about August 29, 2012, and at times prior, employees were exposed to electrical shock and fire hazards while they used a cord which powered a solenoid in the plating area which had strained and damaged insulation at the joint where the cord entered the plug.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.36 G02
- Issued
- Jan 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.36(g)(2): An exit access was not at least 28 inches (71.1 cm) wide at all points: a) On or about August 29, 2012, the width of the exit access through the acid storage room was not at least 28 inches. A pinch point existed between chemical barrels and a box which reduced the access width to 19 inches.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 334412)
More inspections in CO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 336656186.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.