MILLPORT, AL —
OSHA Inspection: MILLPORT LUMBER & MANUFACTURING, L.L.C.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of MILLPORT LUMBER & MANUFACTURING, L.L.C. in 463 COLUMBUS STREET, MILLPORT, AL 35576 (NAICS 321912). OSHA activity number 336668009.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MILLPORT LUMBER & MANUFACTURING, L.L.C.
- Site address
- 463 COLUMBUS STREET
- City
- MILLPORT
- State
- AL
- ZIP
- 35576
- Mailing
- 463 COLUMBUS STREET, MILLPORT, AL 35576
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 321912
- Employees
- 11
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Oct 30, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling: (a) On or about October 3, 2102 - Resaw Area, a relocatable power tap was series-connected to two (2) extension cords.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $720
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.305 G01 IV A
- Issued
- Oct 30, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure: (a) On or about October 3, 2012 - Resaw Area, two (2) extension cords were used in place of permanent wiring.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1904.10 A
- Issued
- Oct 30, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $240 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.10(a): The employer did not record a hearing loss case on the OSHA 300 log when employee's hearing test (audiogram) reveals that the employee has experienced a work-related Standard Threshold Shift (STS) in hearing in one or both ears, and the employee's total hearing level is 25 decibels (dB) or more above audiometric zero (averaged at 2000, 3000, and 4000 Hz) in the same ear(s) as the STS, you must record the case on the OSHA 300 Log: (a) On or about October 3, 2012 - Facility, a hearing loss case reported on July 25, 2012 had not been recorded.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $240
- — Z (O) $400
1904.29 A
- Issued
- Oct 30, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(a): The employer did not use an OSHA 300, 301 and 300A Form or equivalent. (a) On or about October 3, 2012 - Facility, OSHA 300 and 300A forms or equivalent were not maintained.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Oct 30, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through written certification that identified the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, identified the document as a certification of the hazard assessment: (a) On or about October 3, 2012 - Facility, no written certification to verify the hazard assessment had been performed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.133 A02
- Issued
- Oct 30, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(2): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses eye protection that provides side protection when there is a hazard from flying objects. Detachable side protectors (e.g. clip-on or slide-on side shields) meeting the pertinent requirements of this section are acceptable: (a) On or about October 3, 2012 - Baker Resaw, an employee wore eye protection that was not equipped with side protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 321912)
More inspections in AL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336668009.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.