DEMOPOLIS, AL ·
OSHA Inspection: MARICORP US
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MARICORP US in 130 YACHT BASIN DRIVE, DEMOPOLIS, AL 36732 (NAICS 332311). OSHA activity number 336672787.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MARICORP US
- Site address
- 130 YACHT BASIN DRIVE
- City
- DEMOPOLIS
- State
- AL
- ZIP
- 36732
- Mailing
- PO BOX 701, SHELL KNOB, MO 65747
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332311
- Employees
- 30
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.106 A
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,678 · Current $1,399 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.106(a): Employees working over or near water where the danger of drowning existed, were not provided with U.S. Coast Guard approved life jackets or buoyant work vests: a) On or about October 3, 2012 and times prior at 130 Yacht Basin Drive, Demopolis, AL 36732: The employer failed to provide personal flotation devices for employees installing steel roofing 22.7 feet above water exposing them to drowning hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1399
- · Z (S) $2678
1926.451 A06
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,410 · Current $2,205 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not constructed in accordance with the design by a qualified person: a) On or about October 3, 2012 and times prior at 130 Yacht Basin Drive, Demopolis, AL 36732; The employer failed to ensure a qualified person designed the Haul Master rolling scaffold when it was built above the manufactures maximum height of two stages. The scaffold was built five stages high without design specifications by a qualified person as to load limits which exposed employees using the scaffold to access a roof approximately 23 feet high to fall hazards. b) On or about October 3, 2012 and times prior at 130 Yacht Basin Drive, Demopolis, AL 36732; The employer failed to ensure a qualified person designed the Haul Master rolling scaffold when it was built above the manufactures maximum height of two stages. The scaffold was built five stages high without design specifications by a qualified person as to proper support locations such as but not limited to guys, ties, or braces to support both inner and outer legs to prevent tipping due to the scaffold exceeding the 4:1 height ratio, which exposed employees using the scaffold to access a roof approximately 23 feet high to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2205
- · Z (S) $4410
1926.451 F03
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity: a) On or about October 3, 2012 and times prior at 130 Yacht Basin Drive, Demopolis, AL 36732 : The employer failed to ensure the competent person prior to allowing employees to use a Haul Mounting rolling scaffold to access the working level of the metal roof being installed over marina boat slips. The scaffold was unsafe for use due to items such as but not limited to building the scaffold 5 bucks high when the manufacture only allows 2 bucks high, improperly securing the scaffold with a tie down strap, and no fall protection installed on top level platform which employees walked across to access the roof.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,410 · Current $2,205 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level: a) On or about October 3, 2012 and times prior at 130 Yacht Basin Drive, Demopolis, AL 36732: The employer failed to ensure fall protection was provided to protect employees as they walked across the unprotected top plank to access their work area (the roof) exposing employees to fall hazards associated with falls of 22 feet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2205
- · Z (S) $4410
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,150 · Current $1,575 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where a portable ladder was used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladders length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a) On or about October 3, 2012 and times prior at 130 Yacht Basin Drive, Demopolis, AL 36732; The employer failed to ensure the integrated scaffold ladder used by employees to access the roof was 3 feet above the working surface (roof) which exposed employees to hazards associated with falls 22 feet during transition.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1575
- · Z (S) $3150
1926.760 A01
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,150 · Current $1,496 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.760(a)(1): Each employee engaged in a steel erection activity who is on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge more than 15 feet (4.6 m) above a lower level was not protected from fall hazards by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, positioning device systems, or fall restraint systems. a) On or about October 3, 2012 and times prior at 130 Yacht Basin Drive, Demopolis, AL 36732: The employer did not provide fall protection for employees installing metal roofing over the marina boat slips exposing employees to unprotected side and edge with fall hazards of 22.7 or 24.7 feet to adjacent dock/water.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1496
- · Z (S) $3150
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332311)
More inspections in AL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 336672787.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.