LISBON, OH —
OSHA Inspection: ALLAY SENIOR CARE, LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ALLAY SENIOR CARE, LLC in 131 PENDALTON STREET, LISBON, OH 44432 (NAICS 623312). OSHA activity number 336704788.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ALLAY SENIOR CARE, LLC
- Site address
- 131 PENDALTON STREET
- City
- LISBON
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44432
- Mailing
- 131 PENDALTON STREET, LISBON, OH 44432
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 623312
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1030 C01 I
- Issued
- Oct 24, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 8, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): The employer having employee(s) with occupational exposure did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure: On and before October 19, 2012, employees were exposed to blood while testing blood glucose levels. The employer had not developed and implemented a written exposure control plan.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1030 C02 I
- Issued
- Oct 24, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 8, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(2)(i): The employer having employees with occupational exposure did not prepare an exposure determination: On and before October 19, 2012, employees were exposed to blood while testing blood glucose levels. The employer had not prepared an exposure determination.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 D02 I
- Issued
- Oct 24, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 8, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(2)(i): Engineering and work practice controls were not used to eliminate or minimize employees exposure: On and before October 19, 2012 non-safety engineered lancets were utilized by employees within the facility.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1030 D02 VII A
- Issued
- Oct 24, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 8, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(2)(vii)(A): Contaminated needles and other contaminated sharps were bent, recapped, or removed: On and before October 19, 2012 employees were required to remove used lancets from fingerstick devices.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 G02 I
- Issued
- Oct 24, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 8, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee with occupational exposure participated in a training program: On and before October 29, 2012 employees had not received training addressing elements required by 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii)(A) - 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii)(N).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Oct 24, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 8, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,020 · Current $612 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: On and before October 19, 2012, employees utilized potentially harmful chemicals including but not limited to OdoBan concentrate. The company had not developed and implemented a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $612
- — Z (S) $1020
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Oct 24, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 8, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s): On and before October 19, 2012, employees utilized potentially harmful chemicals including but not limited to OdoBan concentrate. Material safety data sheets were not available for chemicals utilized at the facility.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Oct 24, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 8, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: On and before October 19, 2012, employees utilized potentially harmful chemicals including but not limited to OdoBan concentrate. Employees had not received hazard communication training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 623312)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336704788.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.