Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JAMES SEXTON

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JAMES SEXTON in 809 LEE ST., BLOOMINGTON, IL 61701 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 336786587.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch James Sexton — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for James Sexton is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JAMES SEXTON
Site address
809 LEE ST.
City
BLOOMINGTON
State
IL
ZIP
61701
Mailing
222 MAPLE ST., BUFFALO, IA 52728
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2012
Abate by
Oct 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1):     The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:    Employees working on a roof were exposed to fall hazards because the employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program to control and eliminate the hazards present at the jobsite in accordance with the OSHA regulations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2012
Abate by
Oct 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2):     The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s)    Employee performing roofing activities on a residential roof were exposed to fall hazards and a competent person had not performed frequent and regular safety inspections of the construction site to identify and eliminate the hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2012
Abate by
Oct 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):     Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 21.5 feet while removing shingles without appropriate fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2012
Abate by
Oct 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):     The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    Employees were exposed to fall hazards while removing shingles without appropriate fall protection in place and were not trained to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize the hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2012
Abate by
Oct 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):     Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:    Employees were exposed to a fall of approximately 12 feet when using an extension ladder to access a roof to perform roofing operations and the side rails of the ladder extended approximately two (2) inches above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2012
Abate by
Oct 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a):     The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.      Employees were exposed to a falls of approximately 12 feet when using an extension ladder to access a roof to perform roofing operations and the side rails of the ladders extended approximately two (2) inches above the landing surface. The employer did not provide training for each employee that would have enabled them to recognize the hazards and provided them with the procedures to follow to minimize these hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2012
Abate by
Oct 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4):     Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed:    Employees were exposed to fall hazards up to approximately 21.5 feet because the sections of  a 24 foot extension ladder were separated and used separately to access a a porch roof and the upper section of the roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2012
Abate by
Oct 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6):     Unsecured ladder(s) were used on surfaces that were not stable and level:    Employees were expose to fall hazards while utilizing the top section of an extension ladder placed on a sloped porch roof to access an upper section of roof.  The ladder section was not secured to the roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336786587.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.