Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CHERRY TREE RESIDENTIAL SERVICES, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CHERRY TREE RESIDENTIAL SERVICES, INC. in 2111 WEST SLAUGHTER, AUSTIN, TX 78748 (NAICS 621399). OSHA activity number 336799184.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Cherry Tree Residential Services, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Cherry Tree Residential Services, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2111 WEST SLAUGHTER
City
AUSTIN
State
TX
ZIP
78748
Mailing
2111 WEST SLAUGHTER, AUSTIN, TX 78748
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
621399
Employees
45
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1030 C01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jan 18, 2013
Abate by
Feb 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i):  The employer having employee(s) with occupational exposure did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure:  On or about October 11, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not establish an Exposure Control Plan for employees providing direct care to a diabetic resident who was self-administering insulin injections and using lancets to check blood sugar levels. Employees assist in laundering clothes, perform housekeeping duties, and provide direct care, exposing employees to the hazards of bloodborne pathogens.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $500
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.1030 C02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 18, 2013
Abate by
Feb 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(2)(i): The employer having employees with occupational exposure did not prepare an exposure determination:  On or about October 11, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not prepare an exposure determination for all resident locations where occupational exposure may occur such as, but not limited to, when providing direct care for a resident who was self-administering insulin and using lancets to check blood sugar levels. Employees assist in laundering clothes,  perform housekeeping duties and provide direct care, exposing employees to the hazards of bloodborne pathogens.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 D02 VII A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 18, 2013
Abate by
Feb 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(2)(vii)(A):  Contaminated needles and other contaminated sharps were bent, recapped, or removed:  On or about October 11, 2012, and at times prior thereto, at the Waycross location, where a resident who was self-administering insulin recapped needles, exposing employees to the hazards of bloodborne pathogens during direct care.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 F01 II A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 18, 2013
Abate by
Feb 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(1)(ii)(A):  The employer did not ensure that medical evaluations and procedures including the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series, post-exposure evaluation, or follow-up, including prophylaxis, were made available at no cost to the employee:  On or about September 20, 2012 the employer did not provide the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series, post-exposure evaluation, or follow-up to an employee who sustained a needle-stick injury to the hand when disposing of a recapped hypodermic needle from a resident that was self-administering insulin, expsoing employee(s) to the hazards of bloodborne pathogens.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $500
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.1030 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 18, 2013
Abate by
Feb 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(3):  Following a report of an exposure incident, the employer did not make immediately available to the exposed employee a confidential medical evaluation or follow-up:  On or about September 20, 2012 the employer did not make available to post-exposure evaluation and follow-up to an employee who experienced a needlestick while disposing of a recapped needle in a biohazard container, exposing employee(s) to the hazards of bloodborne pathogens.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 G02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 18, 2013
Abate by
Feb 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(i):  The employer did not ensure that each employee with occupational exposure participated in a training program:  On or about October 11, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not provide training on the hazards of bloodborne pathogens to all employees at the time of initial assignment to tasks where occupational exposure may occur, such as, but not limited to, when providing direct care for a resident who was self-administering insulin and using lancets to check blood sugar levels. Employees assist in laundering clothes, perform housekeeping duties and provide direct care, expsoing employees to the hazards of bloodborne pathogens.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $500
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.1030 H05 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 18, 2013
Abate by
Feb 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(h)(5)(i):  The employer did not establish and maintain a sharps injury log for the recording of percutaneous injuries from contaminated sharps:  The employer did not develop a sharps injury log and did not record an employee's needle-stick injury to the hand from a hypodermic needle used by a resident at the Waycross location that occurred on or about September 20, 2012.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336799184.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.