Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MAGIK PRODUCTS CORPORATION

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related health inspection of MAGIK PRODUCTS CORPORATION in 7880 W 20TH AVE, HIALEAH, FL 33016 (NAICS 325620). OSHA activity number 336816186.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Magik Products Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Magik Products Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
7880 W 20TH AVE
City
HIALEAH
State
FL
ZIP
33016
Mailing
12757 NW 103RD AVE, HIALEAH, FL 33018
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325620
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $810 · Current $810
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:    On or about 10/11/12, the employer did not ensure that employees handling chemicals such as but not limited to Polyquaternium 10, Lauramide DEA, SLES 70%, Catemol S-180, Stearic Acid, Proliss 100 and Cetrimonium Chloride during the manufacture of keratin hair treatments wore eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $810
  • — Z (S) $810

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 10, 2013
Abate by
May 1, 2013
Penalty
Initial $810 · Current $810
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    On or about 10/11/2012, at the above referenced jobsite, employees using chemicals such as, but not limited to Pro Liss 100 were not provided with eye washing facilities.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $810
  • — Z (S) $810

1910.1048 M03 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 10, 2013
Abate by
May 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $810 · Current $810
29 CFR 1910.1048(m)(3)(i): The employer did not ensure that hazard warning labels complying with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1200(f) were affixed to all containers of materials listed in 29 CFR 1910.1048(m)(1)(i), except to the extent that 29 CFR 1910.1200(f) is inconsistent with 29 CFR 1910.1048(m):    On or about 08/30/2012, products such as but not limited to Keragreen Kera Hydrate and Keragreen Keratin & Protein Hair Treatment did not contain a hazard warning label that reflected the presence of formaldehyde.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $810
  • — Z (S) $810

1910.1048 M04 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 10, 2013
Abate by
May 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1048(m)(4)(i): The employer used formaldehyde-containing materials listed in paragraph (m)(1)(i) and did not develop and update material safety data sheets:    On or about 08/30/2012, the employer did not ensure that material safety data sheets for products such as but not limited to Keragreen Kera Hydrate and Keragreen Keratin & Protein Hair Treatment reflected the presence of formaldehyde.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 G02

Serious Gravity 1 7 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 10, 2013
Abate by
May 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(2): Each material safety data sheet (MSDS) did not include at least the following sections and associated information under each heading:    a) On or about 08/30/2012, the material safety data sheets for the "KeraGreen Kera Hydrate" and the "KeraGreen Keratin and Protein Hair Treatment" did not contain a list of hazardous ingredients, as required by 29 CFR1910.1200(g)(2)(iv).    b) On or about 8/30/2012, the material safety data sheets for the "KeraGreen Kera Hydrate" and the "KeraGreen Keratin and Protein Hair Treatment" did not contain a list the health hazards, as required by 29 CFR1910.1200(g)(2)(v).    c) On or about 8/30/2012, the material safety data sheets for the "KeraGreen Kera Hydrate" and the "KeraGreen Keratin and Protein Hair Treatment" did not contain a list of the exposure limits, as required by 29 CFR1910.1200(g)(2)(vi).    d) On or about 8/30/2012, the material safety data sheets for the "KeraGreen Kera Hydrate" and the "KeraGreen Keratin and Protein Hair Treatment" did not list the carcinogen information as required by 29 CFR1910.1200(g)(2)(vii).    e) On or about 8/30/2012, the material safety data sheets for the "KeraGreen Kera Hydrate" and the "KeraGreen Keratin and Protein Hair Treatment" did not contain the safe handling, spill and leak clean-up procedures, as required by 29 CFR1910.1200(g)(2)(viii).    f) On or about 8/30/2012, the material safety data sheets for the "KeraGreen Kera Hydrate" and the "KeraGreen Keratin and Protein Hair Treatment" did not contain a list of control measures as required by 29 CFR1910.1200(g)(2)(ix).    g) On or about 8/30/2012, the material safety data sheets for the "KeraGreen Kera Hydrate" and the "KeraGreen Keratin and Protein Hair Treatment" did not contain the contact information for the product manufacturer, as required by 29 CFR1910.1200(g)(2)(x).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1048 D01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1048(d)(1)(i): Employees of a workplace covered by this standard were not monitored to determine their exposure to formaldehyde:    On or about 10/12/2012, at the above referenced jobsite, the employer did not conduct initial monitoring to evaluate employee exposure to formaldehyde.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 10, 2013
Abate by
May 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    On or about 10/11/2012, at the above referenced jobsite, the employer did not develop nor implement a hazard communication program to address employee use of and exposure to chemicals such as, but not limited to, Polyquaternium 10, Lauramide DEA, SLES 70%, Catemol S-180, Stearic Acid, Cetrimonium Chloride, Cetearyl alcohol, and Keragreen Keratin hair products.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336816186.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.