MILFORD, CT —
OSHA Inspection: FLIP SALON & BOUTIQUE
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FLIP SALON & BOUTIQUE in 100 LANSDALE AVE SUITE G, MILFORD, CT 06460 (NAICS 812112). OSHA activity number 336828389.
What this inspection record means
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Watch Flip Salon & Boutique — free
Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Flip Salon & Boutique is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FLIP SALON & BOUTIQUE
- Site address
- 100 LANSDALE AVE SUITE G
- City
- MILFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06460
- Mailing
- 100 LANSDALE AVE SUITE G, MILFORD, CT 06460
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 812112
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Jan 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): Salon: The employer had not conducted a workplace hazard assessment to determine the necessary and appropriate types of PPE for employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.1048 D01 I
- Issued
- Jan 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(d)(1)(i): Employees of a workplace covered by this standard were not monitored to determine their exposure to formaldehyde: Salon: Employees who were required to work with chemicals, such as (but not limited to) Van Tibolli Beauty's GKHair Hair Taming System with Juvexin were not monitored to determine their exposure to formaldehyde.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.1048 N01
- Issued
- Jan 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(n)(1): The employer did not ensure that all employees who were assigned to workplaces where there was exposure to formaldehyde participated in a training program: Salon: The employer did not ensure that employees who were assigned to workplaces where there was exposure to formaldehyde, such as to (but not limited to) Van Tibolli Beauty's GKHair Hair Taming System with Juvexin, participated in a training program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1048 M03 I
- Issued
- Jan 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(m)(3)(i): The employer did not ensure that hazard warning labels complying with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1200(f) were affixed to all containers of materials listed in 29 CFR 1910.1048(m)(1)(i), except to the extent that 29 CFR 1910.1200(f) is inconsistent with 29 CFR 1910.1048(m): Salon: The employer had not ensured that hazard warning labels complying with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1200(f) were affixed to all containers of materials listed in 29 CFR 1910.1048(m)(1)(i), for employees who were required to work with chemicals, such as (but not limited to) Van Tibolli Beauty's GKHair Hair Taming System with Juvexin.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.1048 M05
- Issued
- Jan 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(m)(5): The employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at the workplace, a written hazard communication program for formaldehyde exposures in the workplace, which at a minimum described how the requirements specified in this paragraph for labels and other forms of warning and material safety data sheets, and paragraph (n) for employee information and training, would be met: Salon: The employer had not established and implemented a written hazard communication program for formaldehyde exposures in the workplace, for employees who were required to work with chemicals, such as (but not limited to) Van Tibolli Beauty's GKHair Hair Taming System with Juvexin.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jan 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: Salon: The employer had not established and implemented a written hazard communication program for employees who were required to work with chemicals, such as (but not limited to) Barbicide, Redken Pro-oxide and hair coloring products.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $840
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jan 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employers did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area and chemical-specific information was not always available through labels and material safety data sheets: Salon: Employees required to work with chemicals, such as to (but not limited to) Barbicide, Redken Pro-oxide and hair coloring products, were not provided with information and training on hazardous chemical communications.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Jan 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use: Salon: The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.38 B
- Issued
- Jan 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 14, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.38(b): An emergency action plan was not in writing, kept in the workplace, and available to employees for review: Salon: The employer did not have an emergency action plan, written or oral, in place.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 812112)
Jun 29, 2026
317744188 - Balm PDX LLC · PORTLAND, OR
Jun 15, 2026
161364 - Merle Harris · TROY, NC
Jun 9, 2026
John Paul Mitchell Systems INC · SANTA CLARITA, CA
May 13, 2026
Genia'S Keratin SPA LLC · WESTON, FL
Mar 31, 2026
TSG Investments LLC · CENTRAL FALLS, RI
More inspections in CT
Jul 16, 2026
Bianco & Sons, LLC · EAST HAVEN, CT
Jul 16, 2026
Moms Enfield · ENFIELD, CT
Jul 16, 2026
Harbor Freight · DAYVILLE, CT
Jul 14, 2026
Jananii, LLC · NEW BRITAIN, CT
Jul 14, 2026
Truss Manufacturing INC · NEWINGTON, CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336828389.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.