PONTE VEDRA BEACH, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: NOBLE CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of NOBLE CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC. in 1025 PONTE VEDRA BLVD., PONTE VEDRA BEACH, FL 32082 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 336853585.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NOBLE CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC.
- Site address
- 1025 PONTE VEDRA BLVD.
- City
- PONTE VEDRA BEACH
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32082
- Mailing
- 6999-02 MERRILL ROAD #306, JACKSONVILLE, FL 32277
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Oct 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a. On or about October 15, 2012, two employees were using pneumatic nailers without the use of protective eyewear.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2000
- · Z (S) $2400
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Oct 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. On or about October 15, 2012, on the roof framing structure, employees were not protected from a 23 feet fall hazaard by the use of a fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2000
- · Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 336853585.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.