Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MILFORD MEDICAL AND AESTHETIC CARE, PC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MILFORD MEDICAL AND AESTHETIC CARE, PC in 849 BOSTON POST RD SUITE 300, MILFORD, CT 06460 (NAICS 621111). OSHA activity number 336855580.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Milford Medical and Aesthetic Care, PC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Milford Medical and Aesthetic Care, PC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
849 BOSTON POST RD SUITE 300
City
MILFORD
State
CT
ZIP
06460
Mailing
849 BOSTON POST RD SUITE 300, MILFORD, CT 06460
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
621111
Employees
14
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1030 C01 I

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 20, 2012
Abate by
Dec 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): The employer having employee(s) with occupational exposure did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure:    Facility:  The employer, having employees with occupational exposure to bloodborne did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan to eliminate or control such exposure.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $840
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.1030 C02 I

Serious Gravity 1 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 20, 2012
Abate by
Dec 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(2)(i): The employer having employees with occupational exposure did not prepare an exposure determination:    Facility:  The employer, having employees with occupational; exposure to bloodborne did not prepare an exposure determination when they expected the employee to be exposed to blood borne pathogens.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 D03 IV

Serious Gravity 1 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 20, 2012
Abate by
Dec 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(3)(iv): The employer did not clean, launder, or dispose of personal protective equipment required by 29 CFR 1910.1030(d) and (e), at no cost to the employee:      Facility: The employer did not clean or launder any of the employees personal protective equipment (PPE), such as (but not limited to) lab coats that were contaminated with bloodborne pathogens.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 F02 I

Serious Gravity 1 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 20, 2012
Abate by
Dec 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(2)(i): Hepatitis B vaccination was not made available within 10 working days of initial assignment to all employee(s) with occupational exposure:    Facility:  The employer did not offer the hepatitis B vaccination within 10 working days of initial assignment to employees with occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $840
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 20, 2012
Abate by
Dec 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be me    Facility: The employer did not establish and implement written hazard communication program where employees were required to handle and work with chemicals such as (but not limited to) formalin and cidex.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $840
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 20, 2012
Abate by
Dec 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area.    Facility: The employer did not provide employees with physical or health information and training where employees were expected to handle and work with chemicals, including (but are not limited to) Formalin and Cidex.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336855580.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.