Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AMERICAN RANGE, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of AMERICAN RANGE, INC. in 12288 MAHONING AVENUE, NORTH JACKSON, OH 44451 (NAICS 713990). OSHA activity number 336875984.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch American Range, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for American Range, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
12288 MAHONING AVENUE
City
NORTH JACKSON
State
OH
ZIP
44451
Mailing
12288 MAHONING AVENUE, NORTH JACKSON, OH 44451
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
713990
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1025 D02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,225 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(2):  An initial determination was not made to determine if any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level:      On 10/19/2012, an employee cleaning the indoor range was exposed to lead at 7.83 times the permmissible exposure limit of 0.050 mg/m3, or the equivalent 3.4mg/m3, during the 55 minute sampling period. A zero increment was added for the 425 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1225
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1025 J01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2013
Abate by
Apr 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1025(j)(1)(i):  The employer shall institute a medical surveillance program for all employees who are or may be exposed at or above the action level for more than 30 days per year:    There was no medical surveillance program established for the cleaning employee who was exposed to lead above the action level and the permissible exposure level 1 to 2 times per week.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1025 E01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2013
Abate by
Apr 13, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(1)(i):  For any employees exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit for more than 30 days per year the employer did not implement engineering and work practice controls (including administrative controls) to reduce and maintain employee exposure to lead:    For the employee as described in citation 1, item 1a:  the employer did not establish engineering and work pratice controls.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1025 E04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2013
Abate by
Apr 13, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(4)(i):  When ventilation was used to control exposure to lead, measurements which demonstrate the effectiveness of they system in controlling exposure were not made at least every three months:    No measurements of the ventilation were taken.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1025 H01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2013
Abate by
Apr 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1):  All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead:    Surfaces at the indoor shooting range exceeded the HUD level of 0.22 micrograms per centimeter squared (ug/cm2) by values ranging as high as 355.0 ug/cm2 (1,613 x the HUD level) to as low as 0.52 ug/cm2 (2.36 x the HUD level).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1025 F02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2013
Abate by
Apr 13, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,225 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1025(f)(2)(i):  The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.134(b) through (d) (except (d)(1)(iii)), and (f) through (m) for each employee required by 29 CFR 1910.1025 to use a respirator:    There was no respiratory protection program established for at least one employee who cleaned the range and wore a 1/2 mask negative pressure respirator with organic vapor cartridges.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1225
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1025 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2013
Abate by
Mar 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1025(g)(1):  Appropriate protective work clothing and equipment was not provided when employee(s) were exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit (PEL), without regard to the use of respirators, or where the possibility of skin or eye irritation exists:    The employee who cleaned the firing range was not provided with adequate protective work clothing and equipment when exposed to lead, lead azide and/or lead staphnate.  The employee wore his own baseball cap and tennis shoes that were not covered.  The employer brought home his protective clothing.    Note:  Appropriate protective work clothing and equipment can include coveralls or similar full-body work clothing, gloves, hats, shoes or disposable shoe coverlets, and face shield or vented goggles.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1025 I02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2013
Abate by
May 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,225 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1025(i)(2)(i):  The employer shall provide clean change rooms for employees who work in areas where their airborne exposure to lead is above the PEL, without regard to the use of respirators:    A clean change room was not provided for the employee who cleaned the firing range, and whose exposure to lead was over the permissible limit.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1225
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1025 I03 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2013
Abate by
May 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1025(i)(3)(i):  The employer shall assure that employees who work in areas where their airborne exposure to lead is above the PEL, without regard to the use of respirators, shower at the end of the work shift:    There was no shower available for the employee who cleaned the firing range and whose lead exposure exceeded the permissible exposure limit.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1025 L01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2013
Abate by
May 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,225 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(ii):  The employer did not train each employee who is subject to exposure to lead at or above the action level, or for whom the possibility of skin or eye irritation exists, in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1025:    Lead training was not provided for the employee who cleaned the indoor range, and who was exposed to lead above the action level and permissible exposure level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1225
  • — Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336875984.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.