Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ST. BERNARD HOSPITAL

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ST. BERNARD HOSPITAL in 326 WEST 64TH STREET, CHICAGO, IL 60621 (NAICS 622110). OSHA activity number 336897780.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch ST. Bernard Hospital — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for ST. Bernard Hospital is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
326 WEST 64TH STREET
City
CHICAGO
State
IL
ZIP
60621
Mailing
326 WEST 64TH STREET, CHICAGO, IL 60621
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
622110
Employees
838
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1030 F01 I

Serious Gravity 5 10 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2012
Abate by
Jan 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $2,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(1)(i): The employer did not make available the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series to all employees who had occupational exposure:    a) On or about October 17, 2012, at the above located worksite, two employees in the Nursing department exposed to blood during their work activities, accepted the employer's Hepatitis B vaccination series offer. The employer failed to provide the vaccination series to the employees after accepting the offer. The employees were thereby exposed to the hazards associated with bloodborne pathogens.     b) On or about October 17, 2012, at the above located worksite, two employees in the Nursing department exposed to blood during their work activities, started, but did not complete, the Hepatitis B vaccination series prior to employment. The employer failed to provide the Hepatitis B vaccination series, according to recommendations of the U.S. Public Health Service.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $4000

1910.1030 F02 IV

Serious Gravity 1 10 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2012
Abate by
Jan 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(f) (2) (iv):  The employer did not ensure that employees who declined to accept the hepatitis B vaccination offered by the employer signed the statement in appendix A:      a) On or about October 17, 2012, at the above located worksite, two employees in the Nursing department exposed to blood during their work activities, declined the employer's offer to provide the Hepatitis B vaccination series. The employer did not ensure that employees who declined to accept the hepatitis B vaccination offered by the employer signed the statement in appendix A:
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.29 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 830 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2012
Abate by
Jan 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(1): A Log of all recordable work-related injuries and illnesses (OSHA Form 300 or equivalent), was not completed in detail as required by the regulation:    a) On or about October 17, 2012, at the above located workplace, the employer's OSHA 300 form for 2012 was not completed in detail as required by 1904.4 through 1904.12. In that:    i) The 2012 OSHA 300 list of recordable injuries and illnesses included eight entries that occurred after July 15, 2012, but did not include the object/substance that directly injured or made the person ill in column F as required by the standards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1030 C01 V

Other-than-serious 1 instance 200 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2012
Abate by
Jan 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(v): The employer, who was required to establish an Exposure Control Plan did not solicit input from non-managerial employees responsible for direct patient care who are potentially exposed to injuries from contaminated sharps in the identification, evaluation, and selection of effective engineering and work practice controls and did not document the solicitation in the Exposure Control Plan:    a) On or about October 17, 2012, at the above located workplace, employees experienced approximately seven sharps injuries since January 1, 2012. The employer did not solicit input from non-managerial employees responsible for direct patient care in the identification, evaluation, and selection of effective engineering and work practice controls and did not document the solicitation in the Exposure Control Plan.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View ST. Bernard Hospital's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336897780.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.