Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: DAPPREIO CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT, LLC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of DAPPREIO CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT, LLC in 845 CANAL STREET, STAMFORD, CT 06902 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 336905187.

Watch Dappreio Construction & Development, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Dappreio Construction & Development, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
845 CANAL STREET
City
STAMFORD
State
CT
ZIP
06902
Mailing
1 TRAP FALLS ROAD SUITE 601, SHELTON, CT 06484
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
12
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.304 I01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.304(i)(1):   Each circular hand-fed ripsaw was not guarded by a hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw above the table and that portion of the saw above the material being cut:    Jobsite: The circular hand fed rip saw that was used by employees to rip trim boards was not guarded with a hood that completely enclosed the portion of the saw above the table.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1120.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v):   A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:    Jobsite:  The employee who was utilizing an aerial lift basket was not attached to the basket or boom with a body belt or a full body harness.    Note:  As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system.  The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336905187.