STAMFORD, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: DAPPREIO CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of DAPPREIO CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT, LLC in 845 CANAL STREET, STAMFORD, CT 06902 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 336905187.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DAPPREIO CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT, LLC
- Site address
- 845 CANAL STREET
- City
- STAMFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06902
- Mailing
- 1 TRAP FALLS ROAD SUITE 601, SHELTON, CT 06484
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236220
- Employees
- 12
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.304 I01
- Issued
- Nov 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.304(i)(1): Each circular hand-fed ripsaw was not guarded by a hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw above the table and that portion of the saw above the material being cut: Jobsite: The circular hand fed rip saw that was used by employees to rip trim boards was not guarded with a hood that completely enclosed the portion of the saw above the table.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Nov 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift: Jobsite: The employee who was utilizing an aerial lift basket was not attached to the basket or boom with a body belt or a full body harness. Note: As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1120
- · Z (S) $1600
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236220)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 336905187.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.