Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LINN ENERGY

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of LINN ENERGY in 4 MILES NORTH OF CO RD 22, WHEELER, TX 79096 (NAICS 333132). OSHA activity number 336911383.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Linn Energy — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Linn Energy is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LINN ENERGY
Site address
4 MILES NORTH OF CO RD 22
City
WHEELER
State
TX
ZIP
79096
Mailing
600 TRAVIS SUITE 5100, HOUSTON, TX 77002
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333132
Employees
510
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2013
Abate by
Mar 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $1,800 Reduced

Hazardous substances 01101480

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2)  The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment.    On October 16, 2012, Huff Salt Water Disposal #32-11, the employer did not perform and certify in writing a hazard assessment of the workplace prior to the introduction of Acrolein.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1800
  • — Z (S) $3000

1910.1200 E02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2013
Abate by
Mar 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $1,800 Reduced

Hazardous substances 01101480

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(2)(i)  The employer, who used and store hazardous chemicals at a workplace in such a way that the employees of other employer(s) may be exposed (for example, employees of a construction contractor working on-site), did not additionally ensure that the hazard communication programs developed and implemented under this paragraph (e) include the methods the employer will use to provide the other employer(s) on-site access to safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical the other employer(s)' employees may be exposed to while working.    On October 16, 2012, Huff Salt Water Disposal #32-11 site, the employer did not implement the requirement of its hazard communication program to provide other employers of employees on-site access to safety data sheets for the hazardous chemical Acrolein, nor did the employer make the safety data sheet available to their employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1800
  • — Z (S) $3000

1910.1200 E02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2013
Abate by
Mar 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 01101480

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(2)(ii)  The employer, who used and store hazardous chemicals at a workplace in such a way that the employees of other employer(s) may be exposed (for example, employees of a construction contractor working on-site), did not additionally ensure that the hazard communication programs developed and implemented under this paragraph (e) include the methods the employer will use to inform the other employer(s) of any precautionary measures that need to be taken to protect employees during the workplace's normal operating conditions and in foreseeable emergencies;    On October 16, 2012, Huff Salt Water Disposal #32-11 site, the employer did not implement the requirement of its hazard communication to provide other employers of employees of any precautionary measures that need to be taken to protect employees during the workplaces normal operating conditions and in foreseeable emergencies.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2013
Abate by
Mar 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 01101480

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1)  The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new chemical hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area. Information and training may be designed to cover categories of hazards (e.g., flammability, carcinogenicity) or specific chemicals. Chemical-specific information must always be available through labels and safety data sheets.    On October 16, 2012, Huff Salt Water Disposal #32-11, the employer did not provide employees with information and training when a new chemical, Acrolein, was introduced to the work area.  The employer had implemented the use of Acrolein in the work area since late September and, as of October 16, 2012, had not provided effective information and training regarding the addition of Acrolein to the water treatment system.  Employees are located on site and periodically perform water checks of each of the water tanks by opening a hatch located at the top of the tank and dipping a container into the tank and also before, during, and immediately after water is being used at an offsite location.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 G08

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2013
Abate by
Mar 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 01101480

29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8)  The employer did not maintain copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they are readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they are in their work area(s). (Electronic access and other alternatives to maintaining paper copies of the safety data sheets are permitted as long as no barriers to immediate employee access in each workplace are created by such options.)    On October 16, 2012, Huff Salt Water Disposal #32-11, the employer did not maintain readily available copies of the safety data sheets (SDS) for Acrolein.  Linn Energy employees go to the facility to check on pumps, water quality, and water tank levels before, during, and after fracturing has occurred.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336911383.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.