FRENCHTOWN, MT —
OSHA Inspection: AXMEN PROPANE, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of AXMEN PROPANE, INC. in 16440 FRENCHTOWN FRONTAGE RD., FRENCHTOWN, MT 59834 (NAICS 454310). OSHA activity number 336931399.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AXMEN PROPANE, INC.
- Site address
- 16440 FRENCHTOWN FRONTAGE RD.
- City
- FRENCHTOWN
- State
- MT
- ZIP
- 59834
- Mailing
- 16440 FRENCHTOWN FRONTAGE RD., FRENCHTOWN, MT 59834
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 454310
- Employees
- 15
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C02
- Issued
- Oct 25, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 16, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2): The employer did not develop and implement a respiratory protection program in accordance with sections i and ii of this paragraph (c)(2) for employees who chose to wear respirators where respirator use was not required: (a) Shop: On or about 17 October 2012 and at times prior the Employer had not established a written respiratory program, had not verified that the employees were medically able to wear a 3M, model 6200, 1/2 face respirator, and did not ensure that the 3M, model 6200, 1/2 face respirators were properly cleaned, stored and maintained to prevent a health hazard to the user.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $840
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Oct 25, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 16, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (a) Shop: On or about 17 October 2012 and at times prior thereto, the employees used chemicals including but not limited to: Methanol, SureLock 5-second Leak detector (Ethylene Glycol, Isopropyl Alcohol) Rodda First Coat Primer (Titanium Dioxide), Rodda All Purpose Equipment Enamel (Titanium Dioxide, Xylene, Ethyl benzene) and the company did not have a written hazardous communication program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1120
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Oct 25, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 16, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace: (a) Shop: On or about 17 October 2012 and at times prior, the employees were exposed to chemicals in the workplace including but not limited to: Methanol, SureLock 5-second Leak detector (Ethylene Glycol, Isopropyl Alcohol) Rodda First Coat Primer (Titanium Dioxide), Rodda All Purpose Equipment Enamel (Titanium Dioxide, Xylene, Ethyl benzene) for which the employer did not maintain material safety data sheets.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K06
- Issued
- Oct 25, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 16, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer: (a) Shop: On or about 17 October 2012 and at times prior the Employer had not provided filtering face piece respirator users with the information contained in Appendix D to 1910.134; N95 respirators were used during sanding operations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 454310)
More inspections in MT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336931399.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.