Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LUTCO, INCORPORATED

Follow-up inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a follow-up safety inspection of LUTCO, INCORPORATED in 677 CAMBRIDGE ST., WORCESTER, MA 01610 (NAICS 332721). OSHA activity number 336935994.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Lutco, Incorporated — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lutco, Incorporated is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LUTCO, INCORPORATED
Site address
677 CAMBRIDGE ST.
City
WORCESTER
State
MA
ZIP
01610
Mailing
677 CAMBRIDGE ST., WORCESTER, MA 01610
Inspection type
Follow-up (F)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332721
Employees
108
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.332 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2012
Abate by
Feb 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $3,000 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8870

29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1):     Employees were not trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertained to their respective job assignments:      Employees who perform electrical maintenance, repairs, and lockout, did not receive training on electrical safe work practices including but not limited to:            a.  The skills and techniques necessary to distinguish exposed live parts from other parts of electric equipment.         b.  The skills and techniques necessary to determine the nominal voltage of exposed live parts, and         c.  The clearance distances specified in 1910.333(c) and the corresponding voltages to which the qualified person will be exposed.          d.  Be familiar with the proper use of special precautionary techniques, personal protective equipment, insulating and shielding materials, and insulated tools.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $3825

1910.333 B02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2012
Abate by
Nov 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 8870

29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2)(iv):     The company lockout program did not require that before circuits were worked on as deenergized, a qualified person did not use test equipment to test the circuit elements and electrical parts of equipment to which employees would be exposed and did not verify that the circuit elements and equipment parts were deenergized.    The lockout program did not require a qualified person to use test equipment to verify the absence of voltage when performing lockout procedures when employees were exposed to energized or potentially energized equipment.      Qualified person. One who has received training in and has demonstrated skills and knowledge in the construction and operation of electric equipment and installations and the hazards involved.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.335 A01 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2012
Abate by
Dec 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8870

29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i):     Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and for the work being performed:      Employees performing electrical lockout procedures and electrical maintenance and repairs were not provided electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the work being performed.  For example, the employees were not provided with electrically rated gloves to take voltage readings when verifying deenergization of circuits for electrical lockout, instead the employees had polyvinyl chloride chemical gloves.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3825

View Lutco, Incorporated's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336935994.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.