LAKE MILLS, WI —
OSHA Inspection: SCHUMAN CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SCHUMAN CONSTRUCTION, LLC in FERRY & MAIN ST., LAKE MILLS, WI 53551 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 336960984.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SCHUMAN CONSTRUCTION, LLC
- Site address
- FERRY & MAIN ST.
- City
- LAKE MILLS
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53551
- Mailing
- W7383 HOPE LAKE ROAD, LAKE MILLS, WI 53551
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236118
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.416 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $1118.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): No employer shall permit an employee to work in such proximity to any part of an electric power circuit that the employee could contact the electric power circuit in the course of work, unless the employee is protected against electric shock by deenergizing the circuit and grounding it or by guarding it effectively by insulation or other means. Employees installing shingles on a residential roof were not protected from a live electric power line within 10 feet of their work space.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1118
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $800.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level. Paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (vii) of this section establish the types of fall protection to be provided to the employees on each type of scaffold. Paragraph (g)(2) of this section addresses fall protection for scaffold erectors and dismantlers. Note to paragraph (g)(1): The fall protection requirements for employees installing suspension scaffold support systems on floors, roofs, and other elevated surfaces are set forth in subpart M of this part. Employees working from a ladderjack scaffold greater than 10 feet above the ground, were not protected from falling to lower levels.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. Employees installing shingles on a residential roof were not protected from falling to lower levels.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $1118.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support. Employees were using an extension ladder to access the upper landing of the roof, of which, the ladder did not extend
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1118
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236118)
BROOKLYN, NY—2026-07-15
MEGA GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NYC INC.
BROOKLYN, NY—2026-07-15
MEGA GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NYC INC.
SYRACUSE, NY—2026-07-14
EMPIRE BUILDERS OF CNY, INC.
RENTON, WA—2026-07-14
WA317992055 - JCC INVESTMENT GROUP LLC
RIVERTON, NJ—2026-07-14
JBF CONSTRUCTION LLC
More inspections in WI
WAUSAU, WI—2026-07-16
MIRON CONSTRUCTION CO. INC.
ELROY, WI—2026-07-15
WABASH NATIONAL SERVICES, L.P.
SUSSEX, WI—2026-07-15
KINGS SUPERIOR CONSTRUCTION LLC
DELAVAN, WI—2026-07-15
TERONOMY BUILDERS, INC.
DELAVAN, WI—2026-07-15
A. GOMEZ CARPENTRY, INC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336960984.