Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: WOLFF CONSTRUCTION, LP

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of WOLFF CONSTRUCTION, LP in 401 N. FREDERICKSBURG ST., SAN MARCOS, TX 78666 (NAICS 238110). OSHA activity number 336973607.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Wolff Construction, LP — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Wolff Construction, LP is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
401 N. FREDERICKSBURG ST.
City
SAN MARCOS
State
TX
ZIP
78666
Mailing
8631 AMITY SCHOOL ROAD, BELTON, TX 76513
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238110
Employees
142
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.51 A01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 60 exposed
Issued
Feb 26, 2013
Abate by
Feb 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.51(a)(1): An adequate supply of potable water was not provided in all places of employment:  On or about October 19, 2012, employees were installing form scaffolding for pouring concrete foundations without an adequate supply of potable water, exposing employees to the hazard of dehydration and heat stress.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that an adequate supply of potable water is provided in all places of employment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2000
  • — Z (S) $4000

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Feb 26, 2013
Abate by
Feb 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $3,000
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury:                                                                                                            On or about October 19, 2012, employees were cutting wood, using circular saws, and cutting rebar using  quick saws and grinders, without wearing safety glasses or face shields, exposing employees to the hazard of being struck by materials or debris.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that eye and face protective equipment is used.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $3000

1926.150 A04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Feb 26, 2013
Abate by
Feb 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $3,000
29 CFR 1926.150(a)(4): Defective firefighting equipment was not immediately replaced.  On or about October 19, 2012, employees were working at the construction site using quick saws and grinders for cutting rebar and the fire extinguishers on the JLG all-terrain forklifts were not immediately replaced when discharged, exposing employees to the hazard of burns.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that fire extinguishers are replaced when discharged.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $3000

1926.251 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Feb 26, 2013
Abate by
Feb 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $6,000 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.251(a)(1): Rigging equipment for material handling was not inspected prior to use on each shift and as necessary during its use to ensure that it was safe.  On or about October 19, 2012, the employer did not conduct an inspection of the rigging equipment such as, alloy steel chains, prior to use on each shift and as necessary during its use, exposing employees to the hazard of being struck by materials.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that rigging equipment for material handling is inspected prior to its use and as necessary during its use to ensure that it is safe.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $6000

1926.251 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 60 exposed
Issued
Feb 26, 2013
Abate by
Feb 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.251(b)(1): Welded alloy steel chain slings did not have permanently affixed durable identification stating size, grade, rated capacity, and sling manufacturer.  On or about October 19, 2012, employees were using two alloy steel chains slings for installing and removing steel forms. The slings were not provided with a permanently affixed durable identification tag stating its size, grade, rated capacity, and sling manufacturer, exposing employees to the hazard of being struck by steel forms.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that welded alloy steel chain slings are permanently affixed with a durable identification tag stating size, grade, rated capacity, and sling manufacturer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.405 G02 III

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 60 exposed
Issued
Feb 26, 2013
Abate by
Feb 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not used in continuous lengths without splice or tap:  On or about October 19, 2012, employees were using two120 volt extension cords, for powering electrical equipment such as hand held circular saws, which were spliced and covered with tape, exposing employees to the hazard of electrical shocks.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that flexible cords are used in continuous lengths without splice or tap.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $3000

1926.405 G02 IV

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 60 exposed
Issued
Feb 26, 2013
Abate by
Feb 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:  On or about October 19, 2012, employees were using two 120 volt extension cords which were not equipped with strain relief at the male end of the plug. The cords were powering electrical hand held circular saws for cutting lumber for the bracing of the concrete forms, exposing employees to the hazard of electrical shock.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that flexible cords are connected to strain reliefs to prevent pull from being transmitted to joints or terminal screws.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B02 I

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 60 exposed
Issued
Feb 26, 2013
Abate by
Feb 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(2)(i): Each employee who was constructing a leading edge 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:  On or about October 19, 2012, two employees were installing the plywood decking on the leading edge of the parking garage and were not provided with fall protection, exposing employees to the hazard of a fall of approximately 11 feet onto a concrete floor.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that each employee who is constructing a leading edge 6 feet or more above lower levels is protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Feb 26, 2013
Abate by
Feb 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who was exposed to fall hazards that enabled each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  On or about October 19, 2012, employees were not instructed in fall protection and the recognition of the fall hazards associated with their work, when installing the plywood decking up to approximately 11 feet high on the leading edge, exposing employees to the hazard of falls.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that employees who are exposed to fall hazards are trained in fall protection and to recognize the fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $7000

1926.602 C01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Feb 26, 2013
Abate by
Feb 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $6,000 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(ii): Modifications or additions which affect the capacity or safe operation of the equipment were made without the manufacturer's written approval.  On or about October 19, 2012, employees were using two alloy steel chains wrapped around the tine forks of a JLG all-terrain forklift that was used for lifting the concrete steel forms, exposing employees to the hazard of being struck by materials and/or loads.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that modifications or additions which affect the capacity or safe operation of the equipment are made with the manufacturer's written approval.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $6000

1926.701 B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Feb 26, 2013
Abate by
Feb 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.701(b): All protruding reinforcing steel, onto and/or into which employees could fall or come against, was not guarded to eliminate the hazard of impalement.  On or about October 19, 2012, employees were working on elevated steel forms for concrete columns while rebar ends were protruding from the concrete floor below them, exposing employees to the hazard of impalements.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all protruding reinforcing steel, onto and/or into which employees can fall or come against, is going to be guarded to eliminate the hazard of impalement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $7000

View Wolff Construction, LP's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336973607.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.