SALEM, OH —
OSHA Inspection: MIKE FISHER CONSTRUCTION AND ROOFING
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MIKE FISHER CONSTRUCTION AND ROOFING in 544 PERSHING AVE, SALEM, OH 44460 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 336980180.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MIKE FISHER CONSTRUCTION AND ROOFING
- Site address
- 544 PERSHING AVE
- City
- SALEM
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44460
- Mailing
- 264 BROOKLYN AVE, SALEM, OH 44460
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Oct 29, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part. On or before October 18, 2012, during roofing activities, the employer did not provide programs that identify and eliminate the hazards, such as eye protection, head protection, fall protection, and other hazards associated with the work being performed at the worksite.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Oct 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system. On or about October 18, 2012, during roofing activities, the employer allowed employees to work on a roof that was approximately 18 feet high with a low slope and did not ensure that the employees were protected from falls.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336980180.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.