Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NAVY EXCHANGE - LIBERTY STATION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of NAVY EXCHANGE - LIBERTY STATION in 2912 NIMITZ BLVD AUTOMOTIVE CENTER AND GAS STATION (BLDG. 344 AND 471), SAN DIEGO, CA 92106 (NAICS 811111). OSHA activity number 336989983.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Navy Exchange - Liberty Station — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Navy Exchange - Liberty Station is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2912 NIMITZ BLVD AUTOMOTIVE CENTER AND GAS STATION (BLDG. 344 AND 471)
City
SAN DIEGO
State
CA
ZIP
92106
Mailing
2912 NIMITZ BLVD, SAN DIEGO, CA 92106
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811111
Employees
25
Ownership type
D

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2012
Abate by
Jan 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:    At the automotive center - On or about 10/19/2012, the employer did not require use of safety glasses when the chemical cleaner 409 was used.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2012
Abate by
Jan 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes    At the automotive center - On or about 10/19/2012, the employer did not require use of chemical resistant gloves when the chemical cleaner 409 was used.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.157 C01

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries:    In the automotive center, brake repair bay - On or about 10/19/12, access to a fire extinguisher was blocked by a bucket and mop.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.157 C04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2012
Abate by
Jan 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(4): Portable fire extinguishers were not kept in their designated places at all times except during use:    In the automotive center, hazardous waste storage area - On or about 10/19/12, a fire extinguisher was stored on the floor.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.176 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2012
Abate by
Jan 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.176(b): Storage of material created a hazard:    a) In the tire center store room - On or about 10/19/12, boxes and body boards were stacked so that they were subject to collapse or falling.    b) In the tire center, store room - On or about 10/19/12, metal locker doors were stored along an emergency exit route and were not protected from sliding or falling.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1001 J04 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2012
Abate by
Jan 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(4)(i): The employer did not attach labels or post signs, required by 29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(4)(i) for previously installed ACM and/or PACM, in areas where they would clearly be noticed by employees who were likely to be exposed:    In the automotive center store room - On or about 10/19/2012, the employer did not attach labels or post signs for previously installed asbestos containing material (ACM).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1001 K01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2012
Abate by
Jan 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1910.1001(k)(1): The employer did not maintain all surfaces as free as practicable of ACM waste and/or debris and accompanying dust:    In the automotive center store room - On or about 10/19/2012, surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of ACM debris.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 F05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2012
Abate by
Jan 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein:    Automotive center, lube technician's bay - On or about 10/19/2012, a spray bottle was not labeled with its chemical contents.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 F09

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2012
Abate by
Jan 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(9): The employer did not ensure that labels or other forms of warning were legible, in English, and prominently displayed on the container, or readily available in the work area throughout each work shift:    a) Automotive center, lube technician's bay - On or about 10/19/2012, a spray bottle did not have a legible identifying label.     b) Automotive center, lube technician's bay - On or about 10/19/2012, a second spray bottle did not have a legible identifying label.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View Navy Exchange - Liberty Station's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336989983.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.