Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: APPLIED POLYMER SYSTEMS, INC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of APPLIED POLYMER SYSTEMS, INC in 519 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, WOODSTOCK, GA 30189 (NAICS 325998). OSHA activity number 337011183.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Applied Polymer Systems, INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Applied Polymer Systems, INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
519 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
City
WOODSTOCK
State
GA
ZIP
30189
Mailing
519 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, WOODSTOCK, GA 30189
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325998
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 4, 2012
Abate by
Jan 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $1,360
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):     The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    On or about October 23, 2012:    Employees were exposed to chemicals while making floc logs and other environmental products.  Chemical products used include, but are not limited to Dry Alum, Hydrated Lime, and Ben Franklin Agricultural Gypsum.  The employer had not developed a hazard communication program.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1360

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 4, 2012
Abate by
Jan 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):     The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area    On or about October 23, 2012:    Employees were exposed to chemicals while making floc logs and other environmental products.  Chemical products used include, but are not limited to Dry Alum, Hydrated Lime, and Ben Franklin Agricultural Gypsum. The employer had not provided training to employees on the hazards specific to the chemicals in their work area.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 4, 2012
Abate by
Jan 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c):     The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use:    On or about October 23, 2012:    Employees in the facility who used various chemicals while producing floc logs and other environmental products were required to wear N95 respirators for protection against dust hazards while dumping dry products.  The employer failed to develop a written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 4, 2012
Abate by
Jan 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i):     The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    On or about October 23, 2012:    Employees were operating a forklift to move products throughout the production area.  The employer did not ensure employees who received online training through a temporary agency completed practical training and were evaluated prior to being permitted to operate the forklift.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337011183.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.