Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: STEVE'S AUTO REPAIR & SALES

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related health inspection of STEVE'S AUTO REPAIR & SALES in 519 WHEELERS FARM ROAD, ORANGE, CT 06477 (NAICS 811111). OSHA activity number 337012199.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Steve'S Auto Repair & Sales for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Steve'S Auto Repair & Sales is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
519 WHEELERS FARM ROAD
City
ORANGE
State
CT
ZIP
06477
Mailing
77 MYRTLE AVENUE, ANSONIA, CT 06401
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811111
Employees
5
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 12, 2013
Abate by
Jul 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  Jobsite: 519 Wheelers Farm Road, Orange, CT.: The employer did not submit their required abatement documentation for the four Serious violations that became final order on 02/28/2013.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $400

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 30, 2013
Abate by
Feb 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):     A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use.    Jobsite: 519 Wheeler's Farm Road, Orange CT. - The employer did not develop a wriiten respirator program for his employees to use and reference when either a 3M P100 elastomeric or a 3M N95 particulate filtering facepiece respirator was required to be worn when performing cleanup duties.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.134 D01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 30, 2013
Abate by
Feb 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(i):     Selection of appropriate respirators was not based on the respiratory hazard(s) to which the worker was exposed and user factors that affect respirator performance and reliability.    Jobsite: 519 Wheeler's Farm Road, Orange, CT. - The employer did not base the selection of the 3M P100 elastomeric respirator and the 3M N95 8511 particulate filtering respirator on the specific respiratory hazards that his workers were exposed to when performing cleanup of the interior contents of the old home.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 30, 2013
Abate by
Feb 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):     The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace. Note:  The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.    Jobsite: 519 Wheeler's Farm Road, Orange CT. - The employer did not provide a medical evaluation prior to employees wearing a 3M, P100 elastomeric respirator that was required to be worn when performing clean up of a residential home.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 30, 2013
Abate by
Feb 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1):     The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT).    Jobsite: 519 Wheelers Farm Road, Orange CT. - The employer did not require their employees who were required to wear a 3M P100 elastomeric respirator and/or a 3M N95 8511 particulate filtering respirator either a quantitative or qualitative fit test prior to use.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 337012199.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.