YONKERS, NY —
OSHA Inspection: GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS INC. in 204 CRESCENT PLACE, YONKERS, NY 10704 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 337014005.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS INC.
- Site address
- 204 CRESCENT PLACE
- City
- YONKERS
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 10704
- Mailing
- 10 HOLLY PLACE, HASTINGS ON HUDSON, NY 10706
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236118
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets: location: entire site on or about: 10/23/12 a) An employee was working on the ground, below a roofing repair job. The employee was not wearing a hard hat.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $600
- — C (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.451 G01 I
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i): Each employee on a boatswains' chair, catenary scaffold, float scaffold, needle beam scaffold, or ladder jack scaffold were not protected by a personal fall arrest system: location: south side of house on or about: 10/22/12 a) An employee, engaged in soffit work from a ladder jack scaffold, was not protected from falling by a personal fall arrest system. The employee was exposed to a fall of 23 1/2 feet.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1400
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards: location: entire site on or about: 10/22/12 a) An employee was working from a pump jack and ladder jack scaffold. The employee was not provided with scaffold safety training.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.454 B
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee who is involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question. The training shall include the following topics, as applicable: location: entire site on or about: 10/22/12 a) An employee set up a pump jack and ladder jack scaffold. The employee was not provided with scaffold safety training.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): For all scaffolds not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, each employee was not protected by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. location: front of house on or about: 10/22/12 a) An employee was engaged in soffit work from a pump jack scaffold, without fall protection. The employee was exposed to a fall of 15 feet.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1400
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.452 J02
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles shall be secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary. When the pump jack has to pass bracing already installed, an additional brace shall be installed approximately 4 feet (1.2 m) above the brace to be passed, and shall be left in place until the pump jack has been moved and the original brace reinstalled. location: front of house on or about: 10/22/12 b) An employee was working from a pump jack scaffold without fall protection. The pump jack scaffold was not bracecd at the bottom of the poles.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1000
- — C (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.452 K01
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(1): Ladder jack platforms exceeded a height of 20 feet (6.1 m). location: south side of house on or about: 10/22/12 a) An employee was engaged in soffit work from a ladder jack scaffold, without fall protection. The scaffold platform was 23 1/2 feet above the ground.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1000
- — C (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. location: roof on or about: 10/23/12 a) Employees, engaged in residential roofing, were not using any means of fall protection. The employees were exposed to a fall of up to 28 feet.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1400
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. location: entire site on or about: 10/23/12 a) Employees, engaged in residential roofing, were not protected from falling up to 28 feet. The employees were not provided with any fall protection training.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did notl extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support. location: north side of house on or about: 10/23/12 a) Employees were using a 36 ft The Pro Lynn ladder to access a ladder jack scaffold. The ladder did not extend 3 ft. above the landing.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $600
- — C (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $1200
More inspections at General Improvements INC.
View General Improvements INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236118)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337014005.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.