Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AZANA CORP.

Federal Agency inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency health inspection of AZANA CORP. in 200 NORTH MOORLAND ROAD, BROOKFIELD, WI 53005 (NAICS 812112). OSHA activity number 337042790.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Azana Corp. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Azana Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
AZANA CORP.
Site address
200 NORTH MOORLAND ROAD
City
BROOKFIELD
State
WI
ZIP
53005
Mailing
200 NORTH MOORLAND ROAD, BROOKFIELD, WI 53005
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
812112
Employees
65
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.36 D03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2013
Abate by
Apr 2, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.36(d)(3):     An exit route door may be locked from the inside only in mental, penal, or correctional facilities and then only if supervisory personnel are continuously on duty and the employer has a plan to remove occupants from the facility during an emergency:    (a)  The exit door on the North side of the building was locked from the inside that would prevent use for egress during a fire or other emergency.    (b)  The exit door on the West side of the building was locked from the inside that would prevent use for egress during a fire or other emergency.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2300
  • — Z (S) $4200

1910.1030 C01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2013
Abate by
Apr 2, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i):     The employer having employee(s) with occupational exposure did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure:    (a)  The company had not developed a written exposure control plan to describe the elements required to eliminate or minimize exposure for employees exposed to blood and body fluids during treatments of customers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1300
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.1030 G02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2013
Abate by
Apr 2, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(i):     The employer did not ensure that each employee with occupational exposure participated in a training program:    (a)  The employer had not trained employees with potential exposure to blood and body fluids performing procedures such as skin care using lancets, waxing procedures, manicures or pedicures on clients, on an exposure control plan or procedures to avoid exposure.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.38 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 65 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.38(b):     An emergency action plan was not in writing, kept in the workplace, and available to employees for review:    (a)  The company did not have a written emergency action plan to describe the actions and/or exit routes for employees to use for evacuation in the event of a fire or other emergency.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 65 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2013
Abate by
Apr 2, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):     The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    (a)  The company did not have a written hazard communication progam to describe how the criteria for material safety data sheets, labeling and training would be met for the chemicals used such as hair dyes, hair permanent solutions, ethyl alchhol, isopropanol, acetone, and cleaning chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H

Other-than-serious 1 instance 65 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2013
Abate by
Apr 2, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h):     Employees were not provided effective information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) and -2 on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced in the workplace:    (a)  The company had not provided information or training to employees regarding the implementation of a hazard communication program and the hazards for chemicals used such as hair dyes, hair permanent solutions, acetone, ethyl alcohol, isopropanol and cleaning chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337042790.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.