SAINT JOSEPH, MO —
OSHA Inspection: INTERLOCK STEEL STRUCTURES U.S.A. INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of INTERLOCK STEEL STRUCTURES U.S.A. INC. in 1111 ALABAMA STREET, SAINT JOSEPH, MO 64504 (NAICS 332311). OSHA activity number 337047583.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- INTERLOCK STEEL STRUCTURES U.S.A. INC.
- Site address
- 1111 ALABAMA STREET
- City
- SAINT JOSEPH
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 64504
- Mailing
- 1111 ALABAMA STREET, SAINT JOSEPH, MO 64504
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332311
- Employees
- 18
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
12 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.107 G02
- Issued
- Nov 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $480 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(2): All spraying areas were not kept as free from the accumulation of deposits of combustible residues as practical, with cleaning conducted daily if necessary. Scrapers, spuds, or other such tools used for cleaning purposes were not of nonsparking material: (a) The spray area had an accumulation of paint residue. The scraper used to clean the spray area was metal and not made of nonsparking material.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $480
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Nov 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $480 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: (a) The Ryobi Drill Press did not have an adjustable guard to cover the unused portion of the bit and chuck above the material being worked.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $480
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Nov 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $480 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch: (a) Fitting Area: Employees were exposed to the Pro-Tech 6 inch Bench Grinder with Adjustable Lamp which had the work rest adjusted at greater than one eighth inch.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $480
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Nov 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch: (a) Cutting Area: The Pro-Tech Bench Grinder did not have the tongue guards adjusted at one fourth inch from the grinding wheel as they were not being used.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.242 B
- Issued
- Nov 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $480 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.: (a) An air nozzle used for cleaning in the spray area was being operated at greater than 90 p.s.i.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $480
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.254 D09 III
- Issued
- Nov 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $480 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.254(d)(9)(iii): Cables with damaged insulation or exposed bare conductors were not replaced: (a) The Plasma Cutter Cutmaster had a cable with damaged insulation and was not replaced in the Fitting Area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $480
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.303 G01 II
- Issued
- Nov 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(ii): The required working space about electric equipment rated 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, was used for storage: (a) Cutting Area: The electrical panel on the east wall was blocked as some metal stock was coming past the end of the shelving unit.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Nov 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein: (a) The spray bottle containing Sawzit coolant did not have a label in the Cutting Area with the identity of the chemical it contained. Sawzit can cause irritation to the eyes, and or skin.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.1200 F05 II
- Issued
- Nov 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings: (a) Cutting Area: There was a spray bottle that did not have a hazard warning on the bottle containing Sawzit. It has a health hazard which can cause an irritation to the eyeas, and a mild skin irritation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Nov 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employers did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area and chemical-specific information was not always available through labels and material safety data sheets (a) Painting Area: Employees such as but not limited to the painter, had not received training on the chemicals they were working with at the time of their initial assignment, such as, but not limited to the paints which are flammable, Diamond Vogel, Ecology Red/Brown Primer L/F, and Diamond Vogel Paint Black Primer which both contain xylene.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Nov 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,200 · Current $1,600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (a) Paint Spray Area: A medical evaluation had not been conducted annually to ensure that employees were medically able to use a respirator. The INTERLOCK STEEL STRUCTURES U.S.A., INC. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 313406381, citation number 1, item 1a and was affirmed as a final order on March 2, 2010, with respect to a workplace located at 1111 Alabama Street, St. Joseph, Missouri.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1600
- — Z (R) $3200
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Nov 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter (a) An employee that was required to wear a respirator when painting was not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator. Interlock Steel Structures was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 313406381, citation number 1, item 1b and was affirmed as a final order on March 2, 2010, with respect to a workplace located at 1111 Alabama Street, St. Joseph, Missouri.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (R) $0
More inspections at Interlock Steel Structures U.S.A. INC.
View Interlock Steel Structures U.S.A. INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332311)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337047583.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.