Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BUCKEYE ABRASIVE, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of BUCKEYE ABRASIVE, INC. in 1020 EAGON STREET, BARBERTON, OH 44203 (NAICS 327910). OSHA activity number 337053789.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Buckeye Abrasive, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Buckeye Abrasive, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1020 EAGON STREET
City
BARBERTON
State
OH
ZIP
44203
Mailing
1020 EAGON STREET, BARBERTON, OH 44203
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
327910
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Feb 28, 2013
Abate by
Apr 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):     The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:    On or about October 25, 2012, the employer failed to have a certified written workplace hazard assessment for employees working around hazards requiring personal protective equipment such as but not limited to dusts and chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.133 A03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 28, 2013
Abate by
Mar 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(3):     29 CFR 1910.133(a)(3): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee, who wore prescription lenses while engaged in operations that involved eye hazards, used protection that incorporated the prescription in its design, or wore eye protection over the prescription glasses or protective lenses with side shields:    On or about January 28, 2013, the employer allowed at least one employee who was exposed to chemical powders and splash hazards from chemicals including but not limited to furfural wear non-safety prescription glasses without side protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 28, 2013
Abate by
Mar 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.138(a):     The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes:    On or about January 28, 2013, in the Mixing Department, the employer did not select and require the employee performing mixing activities to wear gloves that were chemically resistant to hazardous chemicals including but not limited to furfural.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Feb 28, 2013
Abate by
Jul 31, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):     The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures in a workplace where respirators are necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators are required by the employer:    On or about October 25, 2012, a respiratory protection program was not developed and implemented for employees required to wear half mask cartridge style respirators, dust masks, and for at least one employee overexposed to Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated (PNOR), also known as Total Dust listed in Table Z-1, as described below:    On January 28, 2013, the employee who performs mixing of the abrasive wheel ingredients was exposed to Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated (PNOR), also known as Total Dust, at an eight hour time weighted average of 19.003 mg/m3, which is 1.27 times the Permissible Exposure Limit of 15 mg/m3.  The exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 45 minutes not sampled.  The employee wears a half mask cartridge style respirator with Organic Vapor/Acid Gas/P100 combination cartridges.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Feb 28, 2013
Abate by
Apr 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):     The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    On or about October 25, 2012, the employer failed to perform medical evaluations for employees required to wear half mask cartridge style respirators, dust masks, and for at least one employee overexposed to Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated (PNOR), also known as Total Dust listed in Table Z-1, as described below:    On January 28, 2013, the employee who performs mixing of the abrasive wheel ingredients was exposed to Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated (PNOR), also known as Total Dust, at an eight hour time weighted average of 19.003 mg/m3, which is 1.27 times the Permissible Exposure Limit of 15 mg/m3.  The exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 45 minutes not sampled.  The employee wears a half mask cartridge style respirator with Organic Vapor/Acid Gas/P100 combination cartridges.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Feb 28, 2013
Abate by
Apr 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator and annually thereafter.     On or about October 25, 2012, the employer failed to provide fit testing for employees required to wear half mask cartridge style respirators, dust masks, and for at least one employee overexposed to Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated (PNOR), also known as Total Dust listed in Table Z-1, as described below:    On January 28, 2013, the employee who performs mixing of the abrasive wheel ingredients was exposed to Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated (PNOR), also known as Total Dust, at an eight hour time weighted average of 19.003 mg/m3, which is 1.27 times the Permissible Exposure Limit of 15 mg/m3.  The exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 45 minutes not sampled.  The employee wears a half mask cartridge style respirator with Organic Vapor/Acid Gas/P100 combination cartridges.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K05

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Feb 28, 2013
Abate by
Apr 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(5):     Respiratory protection retraining was not conducted annually:    On or about October 25, 2012, the employer failed to perform annual training for employees required to wear half mask cartridge style respirators, dust masks, and for at least one employee overexposed to Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated (PNOR), also known as Total Dust listed in Table Z-1, as described below:    On January 28, 2013, the employee who performs mixing of the abrasive wheel ingredients was exposed to Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated (PNOR), also known as Total Dust, at an eight hour time weighted average of 19.003 mg/m3, which is 1.27 times the Permissible Exposure Limit of 15 mg/m3.  The exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 45 minutes not sampled.  The employee wears a half mask cartridge style respirator with Organic Vapor/Acid Gas/P100 combination cartridges.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1000 A02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 28, 2013
Abate by
Jul 31, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1000(a)(2):     Employee(s) were exposed to an airborne concentration of Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated (PNOR) also known as Total Dust listed in Table Z-1 in excess of the 8 hour Time Weighted Average concentration of 15 mg/m3:    On January 28, 2013, the employee who performs mixing of the abrasive wheel ingredients was exposed to Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated (PNOR), also known as Total Dust, at an eight hour time weighted average of 19.003 mg/m3, which is 1.27 times the Permissible Exposure Limit of 15 mg/m3.  The exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 45 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.1000 E

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 28, 2013
Abate by
Jul 31, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1000(e):     Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d):    For employees including, but not limited to, those described below.    On January 28, 2013, the employee who performs mixing of the abrasive wheel ingredients was exposed to Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated (PNOR), also known as Total Dust, at an eight hour time weighted average of 19.003 mg/m3, which is 1.27 times the Permissible Exposure Limit of 15 mg/m3.  The exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 45 minutes not sampled.        Engineering controls usually effective in these circumstances include but are not limited to the following:     1.  Installation of ventilation equipment that would remove airborne dust generated from the mixing operation;  2.  Terminate the practice of dry sweeping, since this process creates airborne dust.       Abatement Steps     STEP 1:  Effective respirators shall be provided and used by all employee(s) as an interim measure.  Abatement must be completed by ***5 days***.      STEP 2:  Submit to the Area Director a written detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering and/or administrative measures to control employee exposures as referenced in this citation.  This plan shall include, at a minimum, target dates for the following actions which must be consistent with the dates required by this citation.     a)  Evaluation of the extent and location of the hazard source.     b)  Evaluation of control measure options.     c)  Selection of optimum control method(s).     d)  Determination of control measure design.     e)  Ordering and delivery of equipment and material(s).     f)  Installation of control measures.     g)  Training of employees in proper operation and maintenance of newly-implemented control measures.     h)  Assurance of effective performance of control measures.     All proposed control measures shall be evaluated for each particular use by a technically qualified person.  Abatement must be completed by ***30 days***.     STEP 3:  Correction should have been completed by the implementation of feasible engineering and/or administrative controls and their effectiveness in achieving compliance.  Abatement must be completed by ***60 days***.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.107 G02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 28, 2013
Abate by
Mar 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(2):     All spraying areas were not kept as free from the accumulation of deposits of combustible residues as practical, with cleaning conducted daily if necessary:    On or about October 25, 2012, the spraying area located in the Hot Press Department, had heavy build-up of combustible residue on a plastic curtain.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Buckeye Abrasive, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337053789.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.