Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BORG INCORPORATED GROUP

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BORG INCORPORATED GROUP in 5 INDUSTRY DRIVE, PALM COAST, FL 32137 (NAICS 333518). OSHA activity number 337080980.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Borg Incorporated Group — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Borg Incorporated Group is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5 INDUSTRY DRIVE
City
PALM COAST
State
FL
ZIP
32137
Mailing
5 INDUSTRY DRIVE, PALM COAST, FL 32137
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333518
Employees
11
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1):  One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    a.  On or about October 24, 2012, the Victor lathe did not have a chuck guard, exposing employees to flying metals and debris.    b.  On or about October 24, 2012, the three Bridgeport milling machines did not have a chuck guard, exposing employees to flying metals and debris.    c.  On or about October 24, 2012, the Rockwell milling machine did not have a chuck guard, exposing employees to flying metals and debris.    d.  On or about October 24, 2012, the Manhattan heavy duty drill press did not have a chuck guard, exposing employees to flying metals and debris.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $750
  • — Z (S) $1360

1910.242 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 8, 2013
Abate by
Mar 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(a):  Hand and portable powered tools or equipment were not kept in safe condition:      a.  On or about October 24, 2012, the pneumatic air hoses had fittings that were designed for water hoses clamps, exposing employees to a struck-by hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $750
  • — Z (S) $1360

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.242(b):  Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:     a.  On or about October 24, 2012, the pneumatic air hoses used for cleaning exceeded 30 p.s.i..
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1):  Sufficient access and working space was not provided and maintained about all electric equipment (operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground) to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment:    a.  On or about October 24, 2012, the electrical panel was blocked by a pedestal bench grinder.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 8, 2013
Abate by
Mar 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):  The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:      a.  On or about October 24, 2012, the employer did not develop, implement or maintain a written hazardous communication program for chemicals such as but not limited to Benz grind HP 46 oil, Rust Veto 342 solvent coating, WD-40, Mobile synthetic oil, hydraulic fluid, Prep-sol solvent 3919S, and Rubbermaid super degreaser & cleaner.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 8, 2013
Abate by
Mar 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1):  The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use:      a.  On or about October 24, 2012, the employer did not have the material safety data sheet available for chemicals that employees works with on a daily basis such as but not limited to Benz grind HP 46 oil, Rust Veto 342 solvent coating, WD-40, Mobile synthetic oil, hydraulic fluid, Prep-sol solvent 3919S, and Rubbermaid super degreaser & cleaner.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337080980.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.