ROSEMARY BEACH, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: OSMAC CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of OSMAC CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 9961 30A, ROSEMARY BEACH, FL 32461 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 337102784.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- OSMAC CONSTRUCTION, INC.
- Site address
- 9961 30A
- City
- ROSEMARY BEACH
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32461
- Mailing
- 118 AIR FORCE STREET, FORT WALTON BEACH, FL 32547
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 C01 II
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(1)(ii): Supported scaffolds with a height to base width (including outrigger supports, if used) ratio of more than four to one (4:1) were not restrained from tipping by installing guys, ties, and braces: a. On or about October 29, 2012, employees were not protected from a collapse hazard, in that on a 4 buck tubular welded scaffold system, there were no ties, guys or bracing installed.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2400
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. End frames were used as a means of access. a. On or about October 29, 2012, employees performing stucco operations used the end frames as a means of access/egress, exposing the employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01 V
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(v): Each employee on a walkway located within a scaffold was not protected by a guardrail system (with a minimum 200 pound toprail capacity) installed within 9.5 inches (24.1 cm) of and along at least one side of the walkway: a. On or about October 29, 2012, on a 4 buck tubular welded scaffold system, an employee placing stucco was not protected from a 21 feet 2-inch fall hazard, in that the employee was not protected by a guardrail system.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards: a. On or about October 29, 2012, employees were not trained to recoginze control or minimize hazards while performing stucco work from a tubular welded scaffold system.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1926.454 B
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question: a. On or about October 29, 2012, employees who erected a 4 buck scaffold system were not trained by a competent person to recognize, control or minimize hazards, in that the scaffold system was not assembled properly.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 337102784.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.