MACON, GA —
OSHA Inspection: CITY VENTURES, LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CITY VENTURES, LLC in 473 2ND STREET, MACON, GA 31201 (NAICS 238910). OSHA activity number 337138580.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CITY VENTURES, LLC
- Site address
- 473 2ND STREET
- City
- MACON
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 31201
- Mailing
- 3507 HARTLEY BRIDGE ROAD, MACON, GA 31216
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238910
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.403 I02
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.403(i)(2): Live parts of electric equipment operating at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by cabinets or other forms of enclosures: On or about 10/30/12 at Macon, GA: Employees were exposed to live electrical parts while performing demolition work at the following locations: a. Employees were exposed to electrical hazards when using an electrical switch to turn on temporary wiring at the demolition site. The employer failed to install a cover on an electrical switch to protect employees from accidental contact to live electrical parts (120 Volts AC). b. Employees were exposed to live electrical parts (120 Volts AC). The employee failed to properly protect electrical wiring located on the first temporary lighting fixture at the rear entrance to the first floor. The fixture was at a height of 5 foot above the floor.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.404 F06
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, or enclosures was not permanent and continuous: On or about 10/30/12 at Macon, GA: Employees were exposed to electrical hazards when using the electrical light switch used to power temporary lighting at the work site. The switch's electrical box and conduit leading to the electrical box were tested and found to be electrically charged. The employer failed to properly ground the electrical light switch.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.405 B01
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(b)(1): Unused openings in cabinets, boxes, and fittings were not effectively closed: On or about 10/30/12 at Macon, GA: Employees were exposed to electrical hazards when accessing the main electrical power switch for the building. The main electrical fuse box located on the building's main electrical panel had one unclosed opening located on the top of the box.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.405 B02
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(b)(2): All pull boxes, junction boxes, and fittings were not provided with covers: On or about 10/29/12 at Macon, GA: Employees were exposed to electrical hazards when accessing the main electrical power switch for the building: a. The main electrical fuse box located on the main electrical panel was missing its cover. b. The circuit breaker box located on the main electrical panel was missing its cover. c. An electrical junction box located below and to the right of the circuit breaker had a cover that was not attached to the box.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.405 A02 II E
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(E): Lamps used in temporary wiring for general illumination were not protected from accidental contact or breakage: On or about 10/30/12 at Macon, GA: Employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while performing demolition work. The employer failed to protect temporary lamps, located on the first floor of the building, from accidental contact or breakage.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $720
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.405 G02 IV
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws: On or about 10/30/12 at Macon, GA: Employees were exposed to electrical hazards while accessing electrical switches and receptacles located at a work site. The employer did not provide adequate strain relief to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws: a. Main Circuit Breaker Box: The employer failed to provide adequate strain relief to a romex wire that entered an opening located at bottom of the main circuit breaker box. b. Electrical Box: The employer failed to provide adequate strain relief on a romex wire which originated at the main circuit breaker box and entered into the left side of the electrical box. The electrical box is located below and to the right of the circuit breaker box. c. Light Switch: The employer failed to provide adequate strain relief on electrical wiring that entered at the bottom of a light switch's electrical box. The light switch applies power to the building's temporary overhead lighting system. d. Receptacle: The employer failed to provide adequate strain relief on electrical wiring that entered at the top of a receptacle's electrical box. The receptacle box is located directly below the light switch for overhead lighting system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B04 I
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(4)(i): Each employee on walking/working surfaces was not protected from falling through holes (including skylights), more than six feet (1.8 m) above lower levels, by personal fall arrest systems, covers, or guardrail systems erected around such holes. On or about 10/30/12 at Macon, GA: Employees were exposed to falls while performing demolition work. The employer failed to install guardrails around floor openings to protect employees from falling seven feet from the first floor to the basement below.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.651 L
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(l): Guardrails complying with 1926.502(b) were not provided where walkways were 6 feet (1.8m) or more above lower levels of the trench: On or about 10/30/12 at Macon, GA: Employees were exposed to fall hazards when using a wooden walkway that was placed over a 7 foot deep trench and provided access to the side exit of the building. The employer failed to provide a guardrail system to protect the employees from falling from the walkway to the trench below.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.652 A
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.652(a)(1): Each employee in an excavation was not protected from cave-ins by an adequate protective system designed in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.652(c). On or about 10/30/12 at Macon, GA: Employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while constructing a 7 foot deep earthen ramp which connected the first floor to the basement. Employer failed to install adequate protective systems to protect workers from engulfment hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.150 C01 I
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.150(c)(1)(i): A fire extinguisher, rated not less than 2A, was not provided for each 3,000 square feet of the protected building area, or major fraction thereof: On or about 10/30/12 at Macon, GA: Employees were exposed to fire related hazards while performing demolition and remodel work. The employer failed to provide a serviceable fire extinguisher at the work site.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $720
- — Z (S) $1200
More inspections at City Ventures, LLC
View City Ventures, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238910)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337138580.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.