Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MAHAN'S PAINTING & ROOFING

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MAHAN'S PAINTING & ROOFING in 1007 N FAYETTE STREET, JACKSONVILLE, IL 62650 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 337139992.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mahan'S Painting & Roofing — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mahan'S Painting & Roofing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1007 N FAYETTE STREET
City
JACKSONVILLE
State
IL
ZIP
62650
Mailing
352 HARTS PRAIRIE ROAD, FRANKLIN, IL 62638
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 2012
Abate by
Nov 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):     Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and  the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:    Employees were exposed to a fall hazard up to 10 feet 8 inches when using a ladder to access the roof and the side rails did not extend at least 3 feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 2012
Abate by
Nov 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1):       The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:     Employees were exposed to a fall hazard while removing and installing roofing material and the employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 2012
Abate by
Nov 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2):     The employer did not provide frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials, and equipment by a competent person:    Employees were exposed to a fall hazard while removing and installing roofing material and a competent person had not performed frequent and regular safety inspections of the construction site to identify and eliminate the hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 2012
Abate by
Nov 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were other provisions of paragraph (b) of this section used to provide an alternative fall protection measure:    Employees were exposed to a fall hazard up to 10 feet 8 inches while removing and  installing roofing material and no fall protection was being used.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 2012
Abate by
Nov 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1):     The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record containing the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employee:    The employer did not maintain evidence of the required training for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards.  There was no written documentation that included the employees name, date of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employee.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337139992.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.