Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RIDGELINE ROOFING COOPERATIVE,LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RIDGELINE ROOFING COOPERATIVE,LLC in FURGUSON & TOOLE, BOZEMAN, MT 59715 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 337142988.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ridgeline Roofing Cooperative,Llc — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ridgeline Roofing Cooperative,Llc is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
FURGUSON & TOOLE
City
BOZEMAN
State
MT
ZIP
59715
Mailing
1146 S. CEDAR VIEW, BOZEMAN, MT 59715
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2012
Abate by
Nov 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:      (a): Construction Site: On or about October 30, 2012, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to overhead hazards while working below roof construction without overhead protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2012
Abate by
Nov 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system:      (a): Construction Site: On or about October 30, 2012, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to fall of approximately nine feet to the ground below while installing asphalt shingles.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.502 D16 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2012
Abate by
Nov 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could neither free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m), nor contact any lower level:      (a): Construction Site: On or about October 30, 2012, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to striking the level below them while tearing off old asphalt shingles with a lanyard that was incorrectly adjusted.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2012
Abate by
Nov 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $500 Reduced
1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide an effective training program for each employee who was  exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:      (a): Construction Site: On or about October 30, 2012, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to a fall of approximately nine feet to the ground below due to lack of adequate training in the recognition of fall hazards and the means to control these hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $500
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.1053 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2012
Abate by
Nov 22, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step:      (a) Construction Site: On or about October 30, 2012, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to a fall of approximately nine feet to the ground below while using the top step of an 8 foot self-supporting step ladder to gain access to the gable roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2012
Abate by
Nov 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $500 Reduced
1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide an adequate training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary:      (a): Construction Site: On or about October 30, 2012, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to a  fall of approximately nine feet to the ground below due to lack of adequate training in the recognition of fall hazards related to ladders, and the means to control these hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $500
  • — Z (S) $1600

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337142988.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.