COLORADO SPRINGS, CO —
OSHA Inspection: ALFREDO CAMACHO
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ALFREDO CAMACHO in 4411 E SAN MIQUEL, COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80915 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 337200612.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ALFREDO CAMACHO
- Site address
- 4411 E SAN MIQUEL
- City
- COLORADO SPRINGS
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 80915
- Mailing
- 453 S INGALLS ST, DENVER, CO 80226
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Nov 13, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. a) On or about November 1, 2012, employees were exposed to eye injury when operating pneumatic nail guns without any eye or face protection in place. Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Nov 13, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) On or about November 1, 2012, employees were exposed to falls in excess of 10 feet when re-roofing a single family home with no fall protection in place. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Nov 13, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigied support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist emmployees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. a) On or about November 1, 2012, employees were exposed to falls where the ladder used to access the roof did not extend at least 36 inches above the landing surface, nor was the ladder secured against displacement. Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1200
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337200612.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.