DALLAS, TX —
OSHA Inspection: ELEAZAR QUINTANILLA
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ELEAZAR QUINTANILLA in 11333 RIDDICK CT, DALLAS, TX 75218 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 337211213.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ELEAZAR QUINTANILLA
- Site address
- 11333 RIDDICK CT
- City
- DALLAS
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75218
- Mailing
- 6502 CORDELIA ROAD, ROWLETT, TX 75089
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Mar 20, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 28, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment was not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury: This violation occurred on November 2, 2012, at a job site located at 11333 Riddick CT, Dallas, TX; employees using pneumatic nail guns were exposed to eye injuries and were not protected by the use of safety glasses.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.403 B01
- Issued
- Mar 20, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 28, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(1): Employer did not ensure that electric equipment is free from recognized hazards that are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees. This violation occurred on November 02, 2012, at a job site located at 11333 Riddick, CT, Dallas, TX; employees were using a Makita circular saw flexible cord attached to another saws flexible cord and were exposed to electrocution hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Mar 20, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 28, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds were not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports: This violation occurred on November 02, 2012 at a jobsite located 11333 Riddick CT, Dallas, TX: Employees were walking on and working from a two-tier scaffold platform that was not fully planked.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Mar 20, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 28, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level. This violation occurred on November 02, 2012, at a job site located at 11333 Riddick CT, Dallas, TX: Employees were walking on and working from a two-tier scaffold platform and were not protected from fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Mar 20, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2-feet (0.6m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral pre-fabricated scaffold access, or direct access from another scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface were not used: This violation occurred on November 02, 2012, at a job site located at 11333 Riddick CT, TX: The employer did not provide a safe means of access for the scaffold system. Employees climbed the end frames to access the work platform.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337211213.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.