Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JULIAN LUMBER COMPANY, INC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of JULIAN LUMBER COMPANY, INC in 10 MILES EAST OF ANTLERS ON HWY 3, ANTLERS, OK 74523 (NAICS 321113). OSHA activity number 337222210.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Julian Lumber Company, INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Julian Lumber Company, INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
10 MILES EAST OF ANTLERS ON HWY 3
City
ANTLERS
State
OK
ZIP
74523
Mailing
10 MILES EAST OF ANTLERS ON HWY 3, ANTLERS, OK 74523
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
321113
Employees
48
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.24 B

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 5, 2013
Abate by
Mar 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,890 · Current $900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.24(b):     Fixed stairs were not provided for access from one structure level to another where operations necessitate regular travel between levels, and for access to operating platforms at any equipment which requires attention routinely during operations:    On or about October 17, 2012, at the operating stations for the Morbark post peelers in the 8 ft. mill, steps were not installed to facilitate travel between the operating platforms and the floor of the facility exposing employees to the hazards of falls.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $900
  • — Z (S) $1890

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 1 8 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Mar 5, 2013
Abate by
Apr 17, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,890 · Current $900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i):     The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, including but not limited to Items A-D of this section:    On or about October 17, 2012, specific written lockout/tagout procedures for the eight (8) morbark post peelers failed to clearly identify steps for isolating the pneumatics and the lockout/tagout procedure for the 8 ft. mill morbarks referred to the incorrect main circuit breaker.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $900
  • — Z (S) $1890

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 8 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Mar 5, 2013
Abate by
Oct 17, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,410 · Current $2,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii):     The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, was not guarded:    The employer did not ensure point of operation guarding is place to protect employees from having any part of their body in the danger zone during operation.      a) On or about October 17, 2012, in the 8 ft. mill on the Morbark PS8 post peeler, serial number 372, the debarking mechanism was not guarded exposing employees to being caught in the rotating knives.      b) On or about October 17, 2012, in the 8 ft. mill on the Morbark PS8 post peeler, serial number 522, the debarking mechanism was not guarded exposing employees to being caught in the rotating knives.      c) On or about October 17, 2012, in the West Mill on the #1 Morbark PS8 post peeler, the debarking mechanism was not guarded exposing employees to being caught in the rotating knives.      d) On or about October 17, 2012, in the West Mill on the #2 Morbark PS8 post peeler, the debarking mechanism was not guarded exposing employees to being caught in the rotating knives.      e) On or about October 17, 2012, in the West Mill on the #3 Morbark PS8 post peeler, the debarking mechanism was not guarded exposing employees to being caught in the rotating knives.      f)On or about October 17, 2012, in the North mill on the #1 Morbark PS8 post peeler, the debarking mechanism was not guarded exposing employees to being caught in the rotating knives.      g)On or about October 17, 2012, in the North mill on the #2 Morbark PS8 post peeler, the debarking mechanism was not guarded exposing employees to being caught in the rotating knives.      h) On or about October 17, 2012, in the barn pole mill, the Morbark PS8 post peeler, the debarking mechanism was not guarded exposing employees to being caught in the rotating knives.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2200
  • — Z (S) $4410

1910.219 F03

Repeat Gravity 10 9 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Mar 5, 2013
Abate by
Oct 17, 2013
Penalty
Initial $9,800 · Current $5,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(3):     All sprocket wheels and chains seven (7) feet or less above the floor were not enclosed:      The employer did not ensure the sprocket wheels and chains were enclosed on the Morbark post peelers and supporting equipment such as, but not limited to the following:     a) On or about October 17, 2012, in the 8 ft. mill on the Morbark PS8 post peeler, the chains and sprockets for the spike rollers were not guarded exposing employees to being caught in the ingoing nip point.      b) On or about October 17, 2012, in the 8 ft. mill on the Morbark PS8 post peeler, the chains and sprockets for the spike rollers were not guarded exposing employees to being caught in the ingoing nip point.      c) On or about October 17, 2012, in the West Mill on the #1 Morbark PS8 post peeler, the chains and sprockets for the spike rollers were not guarded exposing employees to being caught in the ingoing nip points.     d) On or about October 17, 2012, in the West Mill on the #2 Morbark PS8 post peeler, the chains and sprockets for the spike rollers were not guarded exposing employees to being caught in the ingoing nip points.      e) On or about October 17, 2012, in the West Mill on the #3 Morbark PS8 post peeler, the chains and sprockets for the spike rollers were not guarded exposing employees to being caught in the ingoing nip points.        f) On or about October 17, 2012, in the North/East mill on the #1 Morbark PS8 post peeler, the chains and sprockets for the spike roller were not guarded exposing employees to being caught in the ingoing nip points.    g) On or about October 17, 2012, in the North/East mill on the #1 Morbark post peeler, the chains and sprockets on the live deck were not guarded exposing employees to being caught in the ingoing nip points.    h) On or about October 17, 2012, in the North/East mill on the #2 Morbark PS8 post peeler, the chains and sprockets for the spike rollers were not guarded exposing employees to being caught in the ingoing nip points.       i) On or about October 17, 2012, in the barn pole mill, the Morbark PS8 post peeler, the chains and sprockets for the spike rollers were not guarded exposing employees to being caught in the ingoing nip points.          JULIAN LUMBER COMPANY WAS PREVIOUSLY CITED FOR A VIOLATION OF THIS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARD OR ITS EQUIVALENT 29 CFR 1910.219(f)(3), WHICH WAS CONTAINED IN OSHA INSPECTION NUMBER 314930942, CITATION 01, ITEM 004 AND WAS AFFIRMED AS A FINAL ORDER ON MARCH 29, 2011, WITH RESPECT TO A WORKPLACE LOCATED 10 MILES EAST OF ANTLERS ON HWY 3, ANTLERS, OK.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $5800
  • — Z (R) $9800

1904.29 B01

Other-than-serious 5 instances 48 exposed
Issued
Mar 5, 2013
Abate by
Mar 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $630 · Current $200 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(1):     A Log of all recordable work-related injuries and illnesses (OSHA Form 300 or equivalent), is not completed in the detail as required by the regulation:    This violation was observed on or about November 2, 2012 for the OSHA 300 Log of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses for the year 2012 the following instances were incomplete:    a) Case No. 1 entry, the number of days away (column K) was blank.    b) Case No. 4 entry, there was no check in column I and the number of job transfer or job restriction (column L) days was blank.    c) Case No. 5 entry, there was no check in column I and the number of job transfer or job restriction (column L) days was blank.    d) Case No. 6 entry, column E where the event occurred was blank there was no check in column J.    e) Case No. 7 entry, column F describe the injury or illness was blank, there was no check in column H, and the number of days away (column K) was blank.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $200
  • — Z (O) $630

View Julian Lumber Company, INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337222210.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.