Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FEDEX FREIGHT, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FEDEX FREIGHT, INC. in 93 CONCORD STREET, NORTH READING, MA 01864 (NAICS 484122). OSHA activity number 337239016.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Fedex Freight, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Fedex Freight, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FEDEX FREIGHT, INC.
Site address
93 CONCORD STREET
City
NORTH READING
State
MA
ZIP
01864
Mailing
93 CONCORD STREET, NORTH READING, MA 01864
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
484122
Employees
45
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.38 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 7, 2012
Abate by
Jan 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.38(b):     An emergency action plan was not in writing, kept in the workplace, and available to employees for review:    Location: Facility    On or about 11/5/12, the employer did not keep the  emergency action plan at the workplace and was not available for employees to review.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.38 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 45 exposed
Issued
Dec 7, 2012
Abate by
Jan 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.38(f)(1):     The employer did not review the emergency action plan with each employee covered by the plan when the plan was developed or the employee was assigned initially to a job;    Location:  Loading dock    On or about 11/5/12, the employer did not review the emergency action plan including but not limited to office employees, drivers, and supervisors.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $3000

1910.157 C01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 7, 2012
Abate by
Jan 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $1,500
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1):     Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries:    Location:  Loading dock    On or about 11/5/12, the employer did not ensure that the fire extinguishers at the facility were mounted and readily accessible.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $1500
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 A04

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 7, 2012
Abate by
Jan 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $1,500
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4):     Modifications and additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval:    Location:  Loading dock    On or about 11/5/12, the employer did not receive written approval from the manufacturer to utilize the boom extensions and fork extensions on the Nissan forklifts.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (O) $1500
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 A05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 7, 2012
Abate by
Jan 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(5):     The powered industrial truck was equipped with front-end attachments other than factory installed attachments, however the employer did not request that the truck be marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered:    Location:  Loading dock    On or about 11/5/12, the employer did not mark the Nissan forklifts to show the combined weight capacity of the forklift, while the fork extensions and boom attachment are utilized.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Fedex Freight, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337239016.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.