COLUMBIA, MO —
OSHA Inspection: BATES UTILITY
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BATES UTILITY in NORTH GRINDSTONE PHASE II OUTFALL EXTENSION, COLUMBIA, MO 65202 (NAICS 237110). OSHA activity number 337239222.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BATES UTILITY
- Site address
- NORTH GRINDSTONE PHASE II OUTFALL EXTENSION
- City
- COLUMBIA
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 65202
- Mailing
- 841 WESTWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK DRIVE, COLUMBIA, MO 65203
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 237110
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.651 K01
- Issued
- Nov 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(k)(1): Daily inspections of excavations, the adjacent areas, and protective systems were not made by a competent person for evidence of a situation that could have resulted in possible cave-ins, indications of failure of protective systems: (a) The competent person did not inspect the trench and determine if the trench box had been installed correctly prior to entry.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.652 A02
- Issued
- Nov 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.652(a)(2): Protective systems did not have the capacity to resist without failure all loads that were intended or could reasonably be expected to be applied or transmitted to the system: (a) The steel trench box was not blocked or backfilled behind to prevent shifting of the box should a collalpse of the trench wall occur.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 237110)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337239222.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.