Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FREDY DRYWALL, INC.

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of FREDY DRYWALL, INC. in 12001 COLLEGIATE WAY, ORLANDO, FL 32817 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 337262026.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Fredy Drywall, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Fredy Drywall, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FREDY DRYWALL, INC.
Site address
12001 COLLEGIATE WAY
City
ORLANDO
State
FL
ZIP
32817
Mailing
5931 WINCHESTER ISLE DRIVE, ORLANDO, FL 32829
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt with lanyard attached to the boom or basket was not worn by employee(s) working from an aerial lift:    a. At the site, employees were exposed to a fall hazard 12 feet to the ground below when using a Genie S-40 aerial lift during metal framing operations. A fall arrest system such as a full body harness or a body belt used as a restraint system was not used by employees in the basket of the aerial lift.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.    a. At the site, employees were not protected from falling to the ground while installing metal framing. An employee was exposed to a fall hazard 12 feet high while standing on a piece of plywood placed between the rafters wile installing metal framing at the entrance of the building.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.20 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 23, 2012
Abate by
Jan 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): A safety and health program was not initiated and/or maintained to provide compliance with the general safety and health provisions of the standard:     a. The employer did not develop and implement a written safety and health program to address the company policy on safety as well as the employer/employee responsibilities.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.454 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 23, 2012
Abate by
Jan 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a):  The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards as required by paragraph (a)(1)-(5) of this section:    a. At the site, employees were installing metal framing at the entrance of the building using an aerial lift (elevated scaffold platform). Employees involved in using aerial platforms were not provided training and education in the following:    1. The nature of fall hazards and any falling object hazards.    2. The correct procedures for dealing with erecting, maintaining, and disassembling the fall protection system and falling object protection system being used.    3. The proper use of the scaffold, and the proper handling of material on the scaffold.    4. The maximum intended load and load carrying capacities of the scaffold.    5. Any other pertinent requirements of Subpart "L" (Scaffolds) under 29 CFR 1926.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.503 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 23, 2012
Abate by
Jan 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    a. At the site, employees working at the entrance of the building installing metal framing were exposed to a 12 foot fall hazard and were not provided training and education relating to fall protection, hazard recognition, procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards and the proper use and limitation of fall protection equipment and fall protection systems. The employer did not train employees to inspect their fall protection equipment in order to assure that equipment is in good condition and are functioning properly.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337262026.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.