Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ROWLAND TECHNOLOGIES

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ROWLAND TECHNOLOGIES in 320 BARNES ROAD, WALLINGFORD, CT 06492 (NAICS 326113). OSHA activity number 337267611.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rowland Technologies — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rowland Technologies is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
320 BARNES ROAD
City
WALLINGFORD
State
CT
ZIP
06492
Mailing
320 BARNES ROAD, WALLINGFORD, CT 06492
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326113
Employees
65
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 5, 2013
Abate by
Mar 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $3,430 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1):  The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent for the following instance:    Extrusion Department: A Line #2 operator/technician was exposed to continuous noise at 81.7% dose exposure (8 hr-time weighted average) or an equivalent sound level of 88.5 dBA measured over the 487 minute total sampling time as measured on 02/20/2013.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3430
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,666 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i):     Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section.    Establishment: The employer did not develop specific energy control procedures for equipment, such as but not limited to the building compressor and the Ross & Company Batch Mixer, where multiple energy sources are involved and employee work activities are covered by this section.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1666
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.147 C06 II

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(ii):     The employer did not certify that periodic inspections of the energy control procedures had been performed.    Establishment: The employer did not ensure by written certification that periodic inspection of the energy control procedures had been performed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K06

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9135

29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6):     The basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of this section, shall be provided by the employer in any written or oral format, to employees who wear respirators when such use is not required by this section or by the employer.    Establishment: The employer did not provide the employees with the information in Appendix D prior to them wearing a Gerson particulate filtering facepiece respirator on a voluntary basis.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1030 F02 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(2)(iv):     The employer did not ensure that employees who declined to accept the hepatitis B vaccination offered by the employer signed the statement in Appendix A.    Jobsite: The employer did not ensure that employees who had potential exposure to bloodborne pathogens and who refused the hepatitis vaccination B series signed the declination statement in Appendix A.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337267611.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.