Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FINISHING TECHNOLOGY, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of FINISHING TECHNOLOGY, INC. in 4510 MULHAUSER RD., HAMILTON, OH 45011 (NAICS 332813). OSHA activity number 337340616.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Finishing Technology, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Finishing Technology, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4510 MULHAUSER RD.
City
HAMILTON
State
OH
ZIP
45011
Mailing
4510 MULHAUSER RD., HAMILTON, OH 45011
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332813
Employees
13
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C02 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2012
Abate by
Jan 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii):     The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATION/CONDITION) (DESCRIBE HAZARD)      a) The employer failed to establish the elements of a written Respiratory Protection Program which includes a respirator medical evaluation for employees who voluntarily wears a 3M 6200 Medium 1/2 face tight-fitting respirator while operating on the Anodizing Line.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $840
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2012
Abate by
Jan 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c):     Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:      a) The employer failed to provide an eyewash station  and shower for employees working in the Anodizing Line who handles corrosive materials such as but not limited to sulfuric acid.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2012
Abate by
Jan 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):     'The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment.    a) A certified written hazard assessment had not been completed by the employer to determine what personal protective equipment (PPE) must be worn while performing certain job tasks such as but not limited to anodizing and handling aluminum parts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 K06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2012
Abate by
Jan 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6):     The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:      a)  A copy of the Appendix D located in the OSHA Respiratory Standard 1910.134 was not provided to employees who voluntarily wore 3M 6200 1/2 face tight-fitting respirators and 3M 8210 Particulate Respirator N95 filtering facepiece (dust mask).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2012
Abate by
Jan 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):     The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:      a) A written Hazard Communication Program had not been developed by the employer to inform employees on the chemicals present within the workplace such but not limited to sulfuric acid (hardcoat and type II tanks), pro seal, deox, etch.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Finishing Technology, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337340616.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.