CLEVELAND, OH —
OSHA Inspection: VANTAGE PLACE, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of VANTAGE PLACE, INC. in 3105 FRANKLIN BOULEVARD, CLEVELAND, OH 44113 (NAICS 623990). OSHA activity number 337355218.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- VANTAGE PLACE, INC.
- Site address
- 3105 FRANKLIN BOULEVARD
- City
- CLEVELAND
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44113
- Mailing
- 3105 FRANKLIN BOULEVARD, CLEVELAND, OH 44113
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 623990
- Employees
- 14
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Jan 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,050 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed: On or about November 14, 2012, no written workplace hazard assessment had been completed by the employer for all of their operations including, but not limited to, spill clean up, dispensing concentrated liquid bleach, and cleaning/sanitation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1050
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Jan 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment: On or about November 14, 2012, the employer did not require the use of safety glasses and/or chemical goggles for operations including, but not limited to, the dispensing of concentrated liquid bleach that has a pH of 11-12.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Jan 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,050 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: On or about November 14, 2012, no eyewash was provided for employees who dispensed concentrated liquid bleach that had a pH of 11-12.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1050
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.1030 C01 IV
- Issued
- Jan 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv): The Exposure Control Plan was not reviewed and updated at least annually:
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1750
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.1030 F02 IV
- Issued
- Jan 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(2)(iv): The employer did not ensure that employees who declined to accept the hepatitis B vaccination offered by the employer signed the statement in appendix A: On or about November 14, 2012, the employer did not have employees who declined the hepatitis B vaccination sign the statement in appendix A.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 G02 II
- Issued
- Jan 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that training provided to employees with occupational exposure met the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(ii)(A) through (g)(2)(ii)(B): On or about November 14, 2012, the employer failed to ensure that Bloodborne Pathogens training was provided to exposed employees, including but not limited to, the staff in the Housekeeping and Laundry Departments who are exposed to blood and body fluids.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jan 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: On or about November 14, 2012, the employer failed to develop, implement, and maintain a written hazard communication program which includes a master list of chemicals at the workplace for employees working with hazardous materials including, but not limited to, concentrated bleach, degreasers, detergents, and rinse chemicals.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jan 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: On or about November 14, 2012, the employer failed to provide hazard communication training for employees working with hazardous materials including, but not limited to, concentrated bleach, degreasers, detergents, and rinse chemicals.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K06
- Issued
- Jan 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer: On or about November 14, 2012, employees were provided dust masks to wear voluntarily, but were not provided the information in Appendix D of 1910.134.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 623990)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337355218.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.