Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: WHITE-BROOK, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of WHITE-BROOK, INC. in 1 SYLVANIA STREET, BROOKVILLE, PA 15825 (NAICS 333511). OSHA activity number 337412811.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch White-Brook, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for White-Brook, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
WHITE-BROOK, INC.
Site address
1 SYLVANIA STREET
City
BROOKVILLE
State
PA
ZIP
15825
Mailing
1 SYLVANIA STREET, BROOKVILLE, PA 15825
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333511
Employees
27
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 11, 2012
Abate by
Mar 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii):     The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy in accordance with the requirements noted in the 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(A) through 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(D):      A.)  White-Brook, Inc. - On or about 11/14/12, employees performed maintenance and servicing on equipment including but not limited to gas furnaces and a Dake 25 Ton Hydraulic Press.  The lockout/tagout procedures did not clearly identify all of the specific steps to be followed by employees to isolate and disable the machinery in order to safely de-energize the equipment and control the hazardous energy. The procedures did not include specific sequential procedural steps to detail an effective lockout, steps to verify deenergization, notification of authorized employees before performing lockout and before releasing the lockout, physical location of disconnects and other energy isolation points, instructions on how to drain/relieve stored energy, energy sources, and magnitudes of the energy sources.      ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED:  Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date.  The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, the date and method of abatement and state that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 11, 2012
Abate by
Jan 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9):     Guard for abrasive wheel machine where the operator stands in front of the machine was not constructed so that the peripheral protecting member could be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel:        A.)  White-Brook Inc., upper level - On or about 11/14/12, a skil electric bench grinder (Serial #18G00D0440) was not equipped with a tongue guard.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED:  Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date.  The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, the date and method of abatement and state that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $2800

1904.29 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 11, 2012
Abate by
Jan 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $700 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.29(b)(1):  A Log of recordable work-related injuries and illnesses (OSHA Form 300 or equivalent), was not completed in the detail as required by the regulation:        A.)  White Brook, Inc. - The entries in Column F on the OSHA 300 Log for Calendar Year 2012 were not descriptive in that the agent, object, and/or substance that directly injured or made the person ill was not noted/documented.  These entries occurred with cases that included but were not limited to Case #01.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $700

View White-Brook, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337412811.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.