Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FILEMON HERNANDEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FILEMON HERNANDEZ in 1500 HOLCOMB BRIDGE RD., NORCROSS, GA 30092 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 337427413.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Filemon Hernandez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Filemon Hernandez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FILEMON HERNANDEZ
Site address
1500 HOLCOMB BRIDGE RD.
City
NORCROSS
State
GA
ZIP
30092
Mailing
5877 LANIER BLVD., NORCROSS, GA 30071
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2013
Abate by
Feb 13, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)(a)    On or about November 15, 2012, employee was exposed to chemical hazards when the employer did not have a hazard communication program.  Employees were exposed to chemicals such as, but not limited to, dust generated when sawing Hardie Plank siding.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 G01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2013
Abate by
Feb 13, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical which they used: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)(a    On or about November 15, 2012, employee was exposed to chemical hazards when the employer did not have a hazard a safety data sheet for each chemical in use.  Employees were exposed to chemicals such as, but not limited to, dust generated when sawing Hardie Plank siding.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2013
Abate by
Feb 13, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)    On or about November 15, 2012, employee was exposed to chemical hazards when the employer did not provide employees with information on the location of the hazard communication program and MSDS or employee training.  Employees were exposed to chemicals such as, but not limited to, dust generated when sawing Hardie Plank siding.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F07

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2013
Abate by
Feb 13, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration.    On or about November 15, 2012, employees were exposed to approximately 11.4-foot fall hazards when the scaffold was not assembled under the supervision of a competent person who would have recognized deficiencies such as, but not limited to missing fall protection and poles that were not braced at the bottom.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 G01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2013
Abate by
Feb 13, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level.    On or about November 15, 2012, employees were exposed to approximately 11.4-foot fall hazards when the employees were working on a pump jack scaffold installing siding on the back of building 1503 without fall protection such as, but not limited to, nets, guardrails, or a personal fall protection system (harness, lanyard, and anchorage).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.452 J02

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2013
Abate by
Feb 13, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom.    On or about November 15, 2012, employees were exposed to approximately 11.4-foot fall hazards when the employees installing siding were working from a pump jack scaffold that did not have the legs secured at the bottom.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.454 A

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2013
Abate by
Feb 13, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.    On or about November 15, 2012, employees were exposed to approximately 11.4-foot fall hazards when the employees working on a pump jack scaffold installing siding had not received fall protection training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337427413.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.