DERBY, CT —
OSHA Inspection: NICKS ROOFING SIDING & WINDOWS, LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of NICKS ROOFING SIDING & WINDOWS, LLC in 28 COMMODORE HULL RD., DERBY, CT 06418 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 337427611.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NICKS ROOFING SIDING & WINDOWS, LLC
- Site address
- 28 COMMODORE HULL RD.
- City
- DERBY
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06418
- Mailing
- 124 DAY STREET, SEYMOUR, CT 06483
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Dec 5, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: Worksite: The employee who was installing asphalt roofing shingles with a pneumatic nail gun was not wearing eye protection.
Recent events (3)
- — D (S) $0
- — C (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B11
- Issued
- Dec 5, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: Worksite: The employees who were working on the 10 in 12 pitch roof with an eave height of approximately 19 feet 4 inches above the ground were not protected from fall hazards by the use of guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (3)
- — D (S) $0
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Dec 5, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Worksite: The employees who were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 19 feet 4 inches above the ground while working on the 10 in 12 pitch roof were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — D (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Dec 5, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladders length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Worksite: The extension ladder that was used by employees to gain access to the roof at a height of approximately 19 feet 4 inches above the ground did not have its side rails extended 3 feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (3)
- — D (S) $0
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B15
- Issued
- Dec 5, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(15): Ladders were not inspected by a competent person for visible defects on a periodic basis and after an occurrence that could affect their safe use: Worksite: The aluminum extension ladder that employees were provided with and that was used to gain access to the roof was defective and not safe for use.
Recent events (3)
- — D (S) $0
- — C (S) $1600
- — Z (S) $1600
More inspections at Nicks Roofing Siding & Windows, LLC
View Nicks Roofing Siding & Windows, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337427611.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.