BERRYVILLE, AR ·
OSHA Inspection: NIGHTHAWK CUSTOM LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of NIGHTHAWK CUSTOM LLC in 1306 W TRIMBLE, BERRYVILLE, AR 72616 (NAICS 332994). OSHA activity number 337427629.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NIGHTHAWK CUSTOM LLC
- Site address
- 1306 W TRIMBLE
- City
- BERRYVILLE
- State
- AR
- ZIP
- 72616
- Mailing
- 1306 W TRIMBLE, BERRYVILLE, AR 72616
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332994
- Employees
- 45
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.36 D01
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.36(d)(1): Employee(s) were not able to open an exit route door from the inside at all times without keys, tools, or special knowledge: a. On or about November 13, 2013 the south exit door was locked with a deadbolt lock. This condition exposed employees to a delay in exiting the building in the event of an emergency such as a fire. b. On or about November 13, 2013 the north exit door was locked with a deadbolt lock. This condition exposed employees to a delay in exiting the building in the event of an emergency such as a fire.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2100
- · Z (S) $3500
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 8, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed: On or about November 13, 2013 the employer did not verify through a written certification that a workplace hazard evaluation had been conducted for job tasks such as but not limited to sanding and polishing on metal, using compressed air for cleaning metal after polishing and sanding, spray painting using chemicals such as Cerakote H series parts A and B and cleaning spray paint guns with acetone.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1260
- · Z (S) $2100
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 14, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminates chemical state and physical form: On or about November 13, 2013 at the abrasive blasting room, the employer had not evaluated the respiratory hazards to include a reasonable estimate of employee exposures when employees were loading the abrasive blasting equipment with Ballotini Impact Beads and Blastite (aluminum oxide) and cleaning in the room.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2100
- · Z (S) $3500
1910.1025 D02
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 14, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(2): An initial determination was not made to determine if any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level: On or about November 13, 2012, the employer had not conducted initial monitoring for employee exposure to lead when test firing pistols and cleaning at the firing range. This condition could result in employees being exposed to lead above the action limit or permissible exposure limit.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.242 B
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i: On or about November 13, 2012 in the gunsmith prep area, employees were using six compressed air guns to blow fine metal and dust off of pistol parts with the compressed air greater than 30 pounds per square inch (psi). This condition exposed employees to the hazard of skin and eye contact with metal particles in the following instances: a. 40 psi b. 55 psi c. 45 psi d. 70 psi e. 50 psi f. 45psi
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1680
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: On or about November 13, 2012 for the benefit of employees working with or exposed to chemicals such as but not limited to acetone, Blastite, Ballotini Impact Beads and Cerakote H series parts A and B the employer had not developed a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332994)
More inspections in AR
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 337427629.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.