Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BENNETT BUILDING COMPANY, LLC

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of BENNETT BUILDING COMPANY, LLC in 2400 ARCHBISHOP PHILIP M. HANNON BLVD., MERAUX, LA 70075 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 337434419.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Bennett Building Company, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bennett Building Company, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2400 ARCHBISHOP PHILIP M. HANNON BLVD.
City
MERAUX
State
LA
ZIP
70075
Mailing
188 FRONT STREET, FRANKLIN, TN 37064
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
11
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 G02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 2013
Abate by
Jan 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(2):     The employer did not provide fall protection for employees erecting or dismantling supported scaffolds:    a) The employer did not ensure that employees erecting a supported scaffold were provided with fall protection.  This violation occurred on or about November 16, 2012 when employees were on top of the fifth (5th) buck of fabricated frame scaffold, in the process of erecting the sixth (6th) buck, without any protection from falling to the ground level.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 G01 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 2013
Abate by
Jan 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(v):     Each employee on a walkway located within a scaffold was not protected by a guardrail system (with a minimum 200 pound toprail capacity) installed within 9.5 inches (24.1 cm) of and along at least one side of the walkway:    a)  The employer did not ensure that each employee on a walkway located within a scaffold was protected by a guardrail system with a minimum 200 pound toprail capacity installed within within 9.5 inches (24.1 cm) of and along at least one side of the walkway.  This violation occurred on or about November 16, 2012 when employees on the fifth (5th) buck of a fabricated frame scaffold were required to walk between two sets of scaffolds on a walkway that was not protected by a guardrail system on any side of the walkway.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.451 H02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 2013
Abate by
Jan 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2):     Employees working below a scaffold were not protected from falling tools, materials or equipment in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs (h)(2)(i)-(v) of this section:    a) The employer did not ensure that employees working below a scaffold were protected from falling tools, materials or equipment by either barricading, toeboards, paneling or screening, small opening guardrails, or a canopy structure.  This violation occureed on or about November 16, 2012 when employees were allowed to walk below a fabricated frame scaffold without provisions to protect them from falling bricks, tools, and other materials.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.451 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 2013
Abate by
Jan 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(1):     Each employee on a scaffold was not provided with additional protection from falling hand tools, debris, and other small objects through the installation of toeboards, screens, guardrail systems, or through the erection of debris nets, catch platforms, or canopy structures that contain or deflect the falling objects.  For falling objects too large, heavy or massive to be contained or deflected, the employer did not place and secure such potential falling objects away from the edge of the surface from which they could fall.    a) The employer did not ensure that employees on a scaffold were provided with additional protection from falling objects.  This violation occurred on or about November 16, 2012 when employees working on the fifth (5th) buck of a fabricated frame scaffold were not protected from falling objects from the sixth (6th) buck by the installation of toeboards, screens, guardrail systems, debris nets, catch platforms or canopy structures.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337434419.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.