Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: M&R MANY DUTIES

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of M&R MANY DUTIES in 5451 WARNER ROAD, WESTERVILLE, OH 43081 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 337453211.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch M&R Many Duties — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for M&R Many Duties is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
M&R MANY DUTIES
Site address
5451 WARNER ROAD
City
WESTERVILLE
State
OH
ZIP
43081
Mailing
1468 OCTOBER RIDGE COURT, COLUMBUS, OH 43223
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,040 · Current $1,020 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):  "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.      a.  Employees working on the roof of a residential wooden parking structure 9 feet 8 inches off the ground were not provided fall protection, thereby exposing the employees to a fall from height hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1020
  • — Z (S) $2040

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2012
Abate by
Feb 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):  The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.    a. The employer failed to ensure that the employees were properly trained before engaging in work that exposed them to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $510 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):  When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.    a. CSHO observed employees using a ladder that had been set up for access to the roof. The ladder was aranged in such a manner that it did not extend 3 feet beyong the upper surface and was otherwise utilized more as a ramp than ladder.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $510
  • — Z (S) $1020

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337453211.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.