Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ALFRED VASQUEZ

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ALFRED VASQUEZ in 738 AVENUE C, BAYONNE, NJ 07002 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 337453617.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Alfred Vasquez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Alfred Vasquez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ALFRED VASQUEZ
Site address
738 AVENUE C
City
BAYONNE
State
NJ
ZIP
07002
Mailing
129 BALDWIN STREET, BLOOMFIELD, NJ 07003
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 4, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):     a. 738 Avenue C, Bayonne, NJ - West side roof    b. 738 Avenue C, Bayonne, NJ - East Side roof    Employees performing residential construction activities were not protected by use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.  Employees performing framing and roofing activities were not protected from fall hazards of approximately 24 feet.    Violation observed on or about November 19, 2012
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1200
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.552 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 4, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.552(a)(1): The employer did not comply with the manufacturer's specifications and limitations applicable to the operation of all hoists and elevators.     a. 738 Avenue C, Bayonne, NJ - Back of house    Employer did not ensure that materials hoist was used in a manner specified by its manufacturer.  Employees used materials hoist as a ladder to access the roof, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards.    Violation observed on or about November 19, 2012
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1200
  • — C (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.1051 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 4, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairways or ladders were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, and no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided.     a. 738 Avenue C, Bayonne, NJ - Back of house     Stairways or ladders were not provided for employees to access the first level of the construction area, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards.    Violation observed on or about November 19, 2012
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Dec 4, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were used for purposes other than the purposes for which they were designed.    a. 738 Avenue C, Bayonne, NJ - Front porch  b. 738 Avenue C, Bayonne, NJ - West side roof    a. An A-frame ladder used to access the front porch was used in a manner for which is was not intended or designed. Ladder was used in its closed position as steps, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards.    b. An A-frame ladder used to perform roofing activities was used in a manner for which is was not intended or designed. Employee used the ladder its closed position as steps to access the roof crest, thereby exposing employee to fall hazards.    Violation observed on or about November 19, 2012
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337453617.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.