Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: COMMERCIAL JET, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of COMMERCIAL JET, INC. in 4600 NW 36TH STREET BUILDING 896, MIAMI SPRINGS, FL 33166 (NAICS 488190). OSHA activity number 337508618.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Commercial JET, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Commercial JET, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4600 NW 36TH STREET BUILDING 896
City
MIAMI SPRINGS
State
FL
ZIP
33166
Mailing
P.O. BOX 668500, MIAMI, FL 33166
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
488190
Employees
228
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 25, 2013
Abate by
May 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $6,930 · Current $4,158 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to a fall hazard from an elevated work platform that was not equipped with a complete guardrail system:     a.  On or about October 31, 2012, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to a fall hazard from a work platform that was not equipped with a complete guardrail system, while the platform was elevated with the use of a powered industrial truck to  load and unload an aircraft.       NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4158
  • — Z (S) $6930

1910.178 O02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 25, 2013
Abate by
May 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $6,930 · Current $4,158 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(o)(2): Load(s) were being handled which exceeded the rated capacity of the industrial truck(s):       a.  On or about October 31, 2012, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to a fall hazard from an elevated work platform that exceeded the lateral stability limitations of a powered industrial truck on which it was mounted.    NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4158
  • — Z (S) $6930

1910.178 A05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 25, 2013
Abate by
May 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(5): The powered industrial truck was equipped with front-end attachments other than factory installed attachments, however the employer did not request that the truck be marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered:  a. On or about October 31, 2012, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to a fall hazard from an elevated job-made work platform which was mounted to a powered industrial truck and was not equipped with markings to identify a combined approximate weight of the truck and platform at a maximum elevation with load laterally centered.   NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 A06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 25, 2013
Abate by
May 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6): The employer did not ensure that all nameplates and markings were in place:  a. On or about October 31, 2012, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to a fall hazard from an elevated job-made work platform which was not equipped with a nameplate to indicate load capacity.  b. On or about October 31, 2012, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to a fall hazard when elevated with a forklift that was not equipped with a nameplate to indicate load capacity.   NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 Q01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 25, 2013
Abate by
May 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $6,930 · Current $4,158 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(1): Any power-operated industrial truck not in safe operating condition was not taken out of service, and/or repairs were not made by authorized personnel:    a. On or about October 31, 2012, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to a crushing hazard while working in a job-made work platform that was mounted to a powered industrial truck which had a loose mast.    NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4158
  • — Z (S) $6930

View Commercial JET, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337508618.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.