Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FIRST STUDENT

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FIRST STUDENT in 43 ONIONTOWN RD, DOVER PLAINS, NY 12522 (NAICS 485410). OSHA activity number 337539613.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch First Student — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for First Student is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FIRST STUDENT
Site address
43 ONIONTOWN RD
City
DOVER PLAINS
State
NY
ZIP
12522
Mailing
43 ONIONTOWN RD, DOVER PLAINS, NY 12522
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
485410
Employees
40
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 30, 2012
Abate by
Jan 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,250 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included thge provisions in 1910.1349(c)(1)(i)-(ix) with worksite-specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:     a). On or about 11/26/12, on site, in the garage, for employees conducting painting operations and are required to don North 3M 1/2 mask respirators. The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program to include training, medical evaluations, and fit tests.       Abatement Note:    The following are the specific areas that need to be written in the program:  1910.134(c)(1)(ii) Medical evaluations of employees  1910.134(c)(1)(iii) Fit testing procedures  1910.134(c)(1)(iv) Procedures for proper use of respirators  1910.134(c)(1)(v) Procedures and schedules for cleaning, disinfecting, storing, inspecting, repairing, and discarding.   1910.134(c)(1)(vii) Training of employees of the respiratory hazards.  1910.134(c)(1)(viii) Training of employees in the proper use of respirators.  1910.134(c)(1)(ix) Procedures for regularly evaluating the effectiveness of the program
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1000
  • — Z (S) $4250

1910.134 D01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 30, 2012
Abate by
Jan 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace:    a). On or about 11/26/12, on site, in the garage, for employees conducting painting operations and are required to don North 3M 1/2 mask respirators. The employer did not conduct an evaluation to identify if respiratory hazards existed in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 30, 2012
Abate by
Jan 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:     a). On or about 11/26/12, on site, in the garage, for employees conducting painting operations and are required to don North 3M 1/2 mask respirators. The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program to include medical evaluations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 30, 2012
Abate by
Jan 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:    a). On or about 11/26/12, on site, in the garage, for employees conducting painting operations and are required to don North 3M 1/2 mask respirators. The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program to include fit tests.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 30, 2012
Abate by
Jan 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide effective training to employees who were required to use respirators:     a). On or about 11/26/12, on site, in the garage, for employees conducting painting operations and are required to don North 3M 1/2 mask respirators. The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program to include training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.252 B03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 30, 2012
Abate by
Dec 20, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,400 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(3): Employees exposed to the hazards created by welding, cutting, or brazing operations were not  protected by personal protective equipment in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.132:    a). On or about 11/26/12, on site, for the employee conducting welding opertaions. The employer did not provide FR clothing such as a leather apron and/or jacket.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $3400

View First Student's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337539613.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.