Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ORDERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of ORDERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. in ROUTE 119/COOPERS CREEK BRIDGE, BIG CHIMNEY, WV 25302 (NAICS 237310). OSHA activity number 337568430.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Orders Construction Company, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Orders Construction Company, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
ROUTE 119/COOPERS CREEK BRIDGE
City
BIG CHIMNEY
State
WV
ZIP
25302
Mailing
P.O. BOX 1448, SAINT ALBANS, WV 25177
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
237310
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.62 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2013
Abate by
Apr 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,520 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(c)(1):     The employer did not ensure that no employees were exposed to lead at concentrations greater than fifty micrograms per cubic meter of air (50 ug/m3) averaged over an 8-hour period:    (a)Coopers Creek Bridge:  An employee was plasma arc cutting structural bridge beams and was exposed to 130.0 micrograms per cubic meter of airborne lead for an 8-hour time weighted average for the 280 minute sampling period.  The employer has not ensured that employees were not exposed to lead concentrations above the permissible exposure limit of 50.0 micrograms per cubic meter, as determined on December 20, 2012.    Abatement Certification Required for this Item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2520
  • — Z (S) $4500

1926.62 D04 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2013
Abate by
Apr 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(4)(ii):     Where the employer had previously monitored for lead exposure, and the data was not obtained within the past 12 months during work operations conducted under workplace conditions closely resembling the processes, type of material, control methods, work practices and environmental conditions used and prevailing in the employer's current operations, the employer relied on such monitoring results to satisfy the requirements of 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(4)(i):      (a)Coopers Creek Bridge:  An employee was plasma arc cutting structural bridge beams and was exposed to 130.0 micrograms per cubic meter of airborne lead for an 8-hour time weighted average for the 280 minute sampling period.  The employer was relying on previous employee exposure monitoring that was conducted beyond the past 12 months.  The employer's previous monitoring used for employee exposure was conducted in 2009, as determined on December 20, 2012.    Abatement Certification Required for this Item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.62 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2013
Abate by
Apr 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(e)(1):     The employer did not implement all feasible engineering and work practice controls, including administrative controls, to reduce and maintain employee exposure to lead to or below the permissible exposure limit:    (a)Coopers Creek Bridge:  An employee was plasma arc cutting structural bridge beams and was exposed to 130.0 micrograms per cubic meter of airborne lead for an 8-hour time weighted average for the 280 minute sampling period.  The employer did not implement all feasible engineering and work practice controls to reduce the employee's exposure to lead or below the permissible exposure limit of 50 micrograms per cubic meter, as determined on December 20, 2012.    Abatement Certification Required for this Item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A):     Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function (Construction Reference 29 CFR 1926.103):    (a)Coopers Creek Bridge:  Employees were plasma arc cutting structural bridge beams and were required by the employer and due to exposure to airborne lead to wear 3M half masked air purifying respirators.  The employer did not ensure that the employees were clean shaven.  The employees had facial hair that came between the face and the sealing surface of the respirator, as determined on November 28, 2012.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.62 I05 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2013
Abate by
Mar 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,520 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.62(i)(5)(i):     The employer did not provide adequate handwashing facilities in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.51(f), for use by employees exposed to lead:    (a)Coopers Creek Bridge:  An employee was plasma arc cutting structural bridge beams and was exposed to 130.0 micrograms per cubic meter of airborne lead for an 8-hour time weighted average for the 280 minute sampling period.  The employer has not ensured that adequate hand washing facilities were available for employees that were exposed to lead greater than the permissible exposure limit of 50.0 micrograms per cubic meter, as determined on December 20, 2012.    Abatement Certification Required for this Item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2520
  • — Z (S) $4500

1926.62 M01 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2013
Abate by
Mar 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.62(m)(1)(i):    The employer did not post the following warning signs in each work area where an employee's exposure to lead is above the PEL; DANGER, LEAD WORK AREA, MAY DAMAGE FERTILITY OR THE UNBORN CHILD, CAUSES DAMAGE TO THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, DO NOT EAT, DRINK OR SMOKE IN THIS AREA:    (a)Coopers Creek Bridge:  An employee was plasma arc cutting structural bridge beams and was exposed to 130.0 micrograms per cubic meter of airborne lead for an 8-hour time weighted average for the 280 minute sampling period.  The permissible exposure limit for employee lead exposure is an 8-hour time weighted average of 50.0 micrograms per cubic meter. The employer did not ensure that warning signs were posted which read, WARNING, LEAD WORK AREA, POISION, NO SMOKING OR EATING, in each work area were employees were exposed above the permissible exposure limit, as determined on December 20, 2012.    Abatement Note:  Prior to June 1, 2016, employers may use the following legend in lieu of that specified in paragraph (m)(1)(i) of this section:     WARNING  LEAD WORK AREA  POISON  NO SMOKING OR EATING      Abatement Certification Required for this Item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $2,520 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1):     Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    (a)Coopers Creek Bridge, South End:  Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 16 feet from the structural steel bridge beams.  Employees had to walk 52 inches on the structural steel beams before they could attach to the horizontal life line.  There were openings of 24 inches on either side of the structural steel beam, as observed on November 28, 2012.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2520
  • — Z (S) $3600

View Orders Construction Company, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337568430.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.